🙏 Unholy Alliance: Church and State Collide on Tucson Conservative Radio
🌎🚫 "Help Them Over There": Radio Show's Cold Stance on Immigration 🤰🚫 "Incompatible with Jesus": Pastor Slams Reproductive Rights Bill 💰🤑 Trickle-Down Fantasies: Radio Host Pushes Debunked Econ
Based on the 9/19/24 on KVOI-1030AM.
⏮️ ICYMI: From the Last Show…
😽 Keepin’ It Simple Summary for Younger Readers
👧🏾✊🏾👦🏾
📻 A radio show talked about some big grown-up topics. They said churches 🙏 should be more involved in making rules for everyone, even people who believe different things. They didn't seem to like people coming from other countries 🌎 and thought rich people should pay less money to the government 💰. They also didn't like a new rule that would let more people vote 🗳️ or one that helps women make choices about having babies 🤰. It's important to remember that everyone deserves to be treated fairly and kindly, no matter what they believe or where they come from. 💖
🗝️ Takeaways
🏛️ The show promotes a dangerous blend of religion and politics, threatening the separation of church and state
🌎 Immigration is framed as a threat, ignoring the humanitarian aspects of the issue
💰 Trickle-down economics is presented as fact, despite evidence to the contrary
🗳️ Efforts to expand voter participation through open primaries are portrayed negatively
🤰 Religious arguments are used to oppose reproductive rights legislation
📻 Radio Show Topics
The Unholy Alliance: How Conservative Radio Pushes Christian Nationalism and Regressive Policies
In a recent broadcast that can only be described as a masterclass in right-wing propaganda, a local conservative radio show, Wake Up Tucson on Bustos Media’s KVOI, laid bare the dangerous ideologies that continue to threaten our diverse, multicultural society. From promoting Christian nationalism to attacking immigrant rights and reproductive freedom, the show's content serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing battle for equality and justice in our communities
🙏 The Unholy Marriage of Church and State
The radio show featured an extensive discussion on religion's role in politics, particularly Christianity.
Pastor Chris Collins from Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene argued vehemently for increased church involvement in political discourse, stating, "The church has always been political. It has never not been political until about the last 40 or 50 years and look where it's gotten us."
This perspective dangerously blurs the line between church and state, a fundamental principle of American democracy. Maybe it’s time to start taxing churches?
Collins and the hosts promoted a form of Christian nationalism, suggesting that America was founded as a Christian nation and should be governed according to Christian principles. This view ignores the diverse religious backgrounds of the Founding Fathers and the explicit protections for religious freedom in the Constitution. The discussion also touched on the concept of "Christian nationalism," which Collins dismissed as a media narrative, failing to acknowledge the very real concerns about the imposition of Christian beliefs on a pluralistic society.
Collins' attempt to reframe Christian nationalism as a victim of media bias is particularly insidious.
He claimed, "The Christian nationalism title, I think is a media narrative and it's a narrative for those in our country that, that aren't Bible believing citizens to attach an accusation or a stereotype to anybody that's a believer or, or a follower of Jesus Christ."
This victimhood narrative conveniently ignores the immense cultural and political power wielded by Christian groups, particularly white evangelical Christians, in the United States. It's a transparent attempt to deflect legitimate concerns about the erosion of the separation of church and state and the imposition of Christian beliefs on a diverse population.
🌎 Immigration: Compassion Stops at the Border?
The show's approach to immigration was equally troubling.
Host Chris DeSimone suggested a callous solution to the complex issue of migration: "The church and need has no borders. Right. So what can happen, what should happen is respect the laws of the country and all the churches that want to help these poor people. Can deliver it on the other side of the border."
This perspective is not only devoid of empathy but also ignores the root causes of migration, including violence, persecution, and extreme poverty. It fails to acknowledge the United States' historical role in creating conditions that drive migration, particularly in Latin American countries.
The hosts and guests struggled to reconcile Christian teachings of compassion and charity with hardline immigration policies, ultimately prioritizing nationalist interests over human rights. This approach contradicts the Christian values of welcoming the stranger and caring for the vulnerable and the United States' historical identity as a nation of immigrants.
As descendants of immigrants ourselves, we must challenge this narrow-minded view. The suggestion to provide aid "on the other side of the border" disregards the complex realities faced by migrants and the moral imperative to offer sanctuary to those in need. We must advocate for comprehensive immigration reform that addresses both border security concerns and the humanitarian needs of migrants, while also working to address the root causes of migration in sending countries.
📞 Voices from the Community: Analyzing Caller Perspectives
The radio show featured several callers who offered diverse viewpoints on the topics discussed. Their comments provide valuable insight into how these issues resonate with some members of the public. Let's examine what they had to say:
Betsy: Evangelical Voter Turnout
Betsy called in to share information from a recent episode of Gutfeld, where a discussion with President Trump revealed concerning statistics about evangelical voter turnout. She noted:
"Did you know that the evangelical population, he said, if they would all show up, I wouldn't even have to run. The election would be done. Evangelicals in as a whole have a very low turnout."
This comment highlights a significant political strategy of mobilizing evangelical voters, a key factor in conservative electoral success. From a progressive perspective, it's crucial to recognize this potential voting bloc and work towards engaging all citizens in the democratic process, regardless of religious affiliation.
Marcelino: The Christian's Dilemma
Marcelino voiced a common struggle among Christian voters, expressing his conflict between religious teachings and political policies:
"I don't like the abortion, right? I think all life is precious. Open borders when it comes to immigration. What is a Christian? What should we be doing? I mean, it's tough."
His comments reveal the complex moral considerations many religious voters face when their faith teachings conflict with certain political positions. As progressives, we must acknowledge these genuine struggles while advocating for policies that protect individual rights and promote social justice.
Kathleen Dunbar: Praise for Pastor Collins
Kathleen called to express her admiration for Pastor Collins' sermons on politics and faith:
"He was so good on Sunday that we went back on Wednesday, and my husband looked at me, and he goes, there is another service."
While it's concerning to see such enthusiasm for mixing religion and politics, it's essential to recognize the powerful influence religious leaders can have on their congregations' political views. This underscores the need for progressive faith leaders to offer alternative perspectives that align with social justice values.
Barney: Historical Context on Church-State Separation
Barney provided some historical context on the phrase "separation of church and state":
"It started with a letter from Thomas Jefferson to a group of Baptists with the phrase wall of separation. And he was referring to a wall that would protect the church from the interference of the federal government."
Lily: Concerns about Religious Influence on Politics
Lily expressed worry about the influence of specific religious movements on political figures:
"I have a concern in the political realm, not because I don't believe that Christian shouldn't be involved, but because of some of those that are influencing President Trump. And it's a movement called the new Apostolic Reformation."
Her comments shed light on the complex relationship between fringe religious movements and political power. They remind us of the need for vigilance in maintaining the separation of church and state and preventing any single religious ideology from dominating public policy.
💰 Trickle-Down Delusions: The Myth of Corporate Tax Cuts
The economic segment of the show featured Congressman David Schweikert defending the 2017 tax cuts with the dubious claim that "67% of the entire tax cuts for businesses went to wages." This statement perpetuates the widely discredited theory of trickle-down economics, which has consistently failed to deliver benefits to working-class Americans.
These tax cuts primarily benefited corporations and the wealthy, exacerbating income inequality and reducing funding for crucial social programs. As advocates for economic justice, we must challenge these narratives and push for policies prioritizing workers' rights, fair wages, and investments in public services.
🗳️ Voting Rights Under Attack: The Open Primary Debate
The show's discussion of Proposition 140, which appears to propose an open primary system, revealed a deep-seated opposition to expanding voter access.
Host Chris DeSimone's comment, "The money raised for this thing to shove this down your throat is... Six point nine, six, eight million," frames efforts to increase voter participation as a nefarious plot rather than a strengthening of democracy.
While open primaries are not without controversy, the hostile rhetoric employed by the show's hosts suggests a broader antipathy towards measures that could increase voter turnout and political engagement. As champions of democracy, we must be vigilant against any attempts to suppress the vote or limit political participation, especially among marginalized communities.
🤰 Reproductive Rights in the Crosshairs: The Prop 139 Controversy
Perhaps most disturbing was the show's brief but vehement opposition to Proposition 139, which appears to be legislation supporting abortion rights.
Pastor Collins' statement that "Prop 139 is incompatible with the biblical worldview that has Jesus at the center of it" is a blatant attempt to impose religious beliefs on public health policy.
This rhetoric not only disregards the diverse religious and non-religious perspectives in our society but also threatens the bodily autonomy and healthcare access of women and other pregnant individuals. We must stand firm in defending reproductive rights and challenging the patriarchal systems that seek to control women's bodies and choices.
This radio show is a stark reminder of the ongoing threats to our vision of a just, equitable, and inclusive society. As progressive Chicano journalists, we are responsible for challenging these harmful narratives and providing our readers with accurate, nuanced information that promotes social justice, equality, and human rights.
We must continue amplifying marginalized communities' voices, advocate for policies that benefit the many rather than the few, and work tirelessly to create a more just and equitable society for all. The fight against Christian nationalism, xenophobia, economic injustice, and attacks on reproductive rights is far from over. But with persistence, solidarity, and a commitment to truth-telling, we can build the inclusive, compassionate world we all deserve.
🦉 Three Sonorans Commentary
The Right-Wing Assault on Our Values: Unpacking a Conservative Radio Show's Dangerous Rhetoric
As progressive Latinos committed to social justice, environmental protection, and civil rights, it's crucial that we critically examine and challenge the harmful narratives propagated by right-wing media. A recent conservative radio show broadcast serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing threats to our vision of an inclusive, equitable society.
Christian Nationalism: A Threat to Our Diverse Democracy
The show's promotion of Christian nationalism, exemplified by Pastor Chris Collins' statement that "The church has always been political," is deeply troubling. This perspective not only threatens the constitutional separation of church and state but also marginalizes non-Christian Americans, including many in our Latino communities who practice other faiths or no faith at all.
Collins' attempt to frame Christian nationalism as a victim of media bias ignores the real harm caused by imposing one religious viewpoint on our diverse society. As Latinos, we know firsthand the importance of protecting religious freedom and preventing the domination of one faith in our public institutions.
Immigration: Compassion Stops at the Border?
The show's approach to immigration was particularly heartless. Host Chris DeSimone's suggestion that churches should "deliver [aid] on the other side of the border" ignores the complex realities faced by migrants and refugees, many of whom are fleeing violence, persecution, or extreme poverty in Latin American countries.
As a community with deep ties to the immigrant experience, we must forcefully reject this callous view. The United States, a nation built by immigrants, has a moral and historical obligation to provide compassionate support to those seeking a better life, not to mention addressing the root causes of migration that often stem from U.S. foreign policy.
Economic Justice: Trickle-Down Fantasies
Congressman David Schweikert's defense of the 2017 tax cuts, claiming that "67% of the entire tax cuts for businesses actually went to wages," perpetuates the debunked theory of trickle-down economics. This approach has consistently failed to deliver benefits to working-class Americans, including many in our Latino communities.
We must advocate for economic policies that directly benefit workers, support small businesses in our barrios, and invest in education and healthcare for our families. The myth of trickle-down economics has been used for too long to justify policies that primarily benefit the wealthy at the expense of our communities.
Voting Rights: Defending Democracy
The show's hostile rhetoric towards Proposition 140, which appears to propose an open primary system, is a thinly veiled attack on efforts to increase voter participation. As Latinos, we have long fought against voter suppression tactics and for increased political representation.
We must be vigilant against any attempts to limit political participation, especially among marginalized communities. Expanding access to the ballot box, including through measures like open primaries, is crucial for ensuring that our voices are heard in the political process.
Reproductive Justice: Defending Bodily Autonomy
The show's opposition to Proposition 139, framed by Pastor Collins as "incompatible with the biblical worldview," is a direct assault on reproductive rights. This rhetoric not only disregards the diverse perspectives within our communities but also threatens the health and autonomy of Latina women and other people who can become pregnant.
We must stand firm in defending reproductive justice, which goes beyond the right to abortion to encompass the right to have children, not have children, and parent the children we have in safe and healthy environments. This comprehensive approach is crucial for the wellbeing of our families and communities.
La Lucha Continúa
This radio show serves as a potent reminder of the ongoing struggle for justice, equality, and dignity that we face as progressive Latinos. The fight against Christian nationalism, xenophobia, economic injustice, and attacks on our fundamental rights is far from over.
But we are not alone in this lucha. By standing in solidarity with other marginalized communities, amplifying progressive voices, and continuing to organize and advocate for policies that benefit all members of our society, we can push back against these regressive ideologies.
As the Three Sonorans, we commit to providing our readers with accurate, nuanced information that challenges these harmful narratives and promotes a vision of a just, equitable, and inclusive society. Together, we can build a future that honors our diverse heritage, protects our rights, and creates opportunities for all, regardless of race, religion, or national origin. ¡Sí se puede!
If you enjoyed this article, buy us a cup of coffee!
👯 People Mentioned
Chris DeSimone
Host of the radio show
Promotes conservative viewpoints and criticizes progressive policies
Chris Collins
Executive Pastor at Oral Valley Church of the Nazarene
Advocates for church involvement in politics
Quote: "The church has always been political. It has never been political until about the last 40 or 50 years. Look where it's gotten us."
David Schweikert
U.S. Congressman
Defends conservative economic policies and tax cuts
Quote: "67% of the entire tax cuts for businesses went to wages."
Matt Neely
Co-host of the radio show
Supports conservative viewpoints
Betsy (caller)
Supporter of the show
Praised Chris Collins' sermon on politics and faith
Marcelino (caller)
Expressed concerns about balancing Christian values with immigration policy
Kathleen Dunbar (caller)
Supporter of Chris Collins and his sermons
Barney (caller)
Provided historical context on the phrase "separation of church and state"
Lily (caller)
Expressed concerns about the New Apostolic Reformation movement influencing President Trump
CJ Ham
Local business owner opening a new restaurant called Ham Bones
Courtney Slanaker
CEO of Red Cross of Southern Arizona
Promoting a blood donation event
🧐 Propaganda AI-nalysis
The radio show employs several propaganda techniques to promote a conservative, Christian nationalist agenda:
Appeal to tradition: The hosts and guests frequently invoke the idea that America was founded as a Christian nation, ignoring the diverse religious and philosophical backgrounds of the Founding Fathers and the explicit separation of church and state in the Constitution.
False dichotomy: The show presents a simplistic view of complex issues, particularly regarding immigration and abortion, portraying them as black-and-white choices between Christian values and secular policies.
Scapegoating: Immigrants and progressive policies are often blamed for various societal issues, without acknowledging the complex systemic factors at play.
Bandwagon effect: The show promotes the idea that "true" Christians should support conservative political positions, implying that those who disagree are not faithful or patriotic.
Testimonial: The use of a pastor and religious language to endorse political views lends an air of moral authority to their arguments.
Card stacking: The hosts present selective information that supports their viewpoint while omitting or dismissing contradictory evidence.
Plain folks: The show attempts to appeal to everyday Americans by using relatable language and local examples, while promoting policies that often benefit the wealthy and powerful.
Fear-mongering: The hosts use alarming language to describe progressive policies, particularly regarding abortion and immigration, to instill fear and opposition in their audience.
Glittering generalities: Vague, positive-sounding terms like "biblical worldview" and "Christian values" are used to justify political positions without clearly defining what these terms mean.
Transfer: The show associates conservative political views with religious devotion, implying that supporting these policies is a religious duty.
 | A guest post by
|
You are correct; the alliance between the Bible-thumpers and the Right-wing IS "unholy." We also know that many people in the USA hold beliefs contrary to those held by "Christian nationalists." The Founders (slave-holders and misogynists though they may have been) were reasonable enough to recognize these differences and to suggest a separation of Church and State. However, today's Right-wingers are far less tolerant.
I have no great respect for Bush 41, but I must give him credit. During the primary campaign against Reagan, he referred to the latter's "trickle-down" notion as "voodoo economics," which is as apt a description as any. The wealthy have prospered at the cost of the poor and middle classes. Social Security benefits were taxed for the first time ever under the "sainted" Reagan, so what was trickling down?
Talk radio is more than 91 percent conservative or Right wing. Isn't it amazing how they take to the air waves to bleat lies about the "liberal media"?