When it comes to corporate colonialism, Pima County's Matt Heinz saves his voice for campaign endorsements while staying mum on billion-dollar decisions
Anyway this piece really isnt about Adelita. Its about the secrecy and lack of serious consideration of a project where nobody is allowed to know or say anything all while obviously causing higher water and electricity rates to all of us. It appears to be totally inappropriate for a water guzzling electricity sucking project to be in a desert from the get-go! There are states that have so much water they use it to GET electricity but they want this project HERE?!
For a very short window, Tulsi Gabbard didnt look bad and was an anti war candidate. The window closed though and poof! She was on the dark side, then the absolutely loco side. Now she will undoubtedly lose her job for actually presenting data to a madman.
I don't know what happened to her, but she was alright for a second, even challenging how the Clintons and DNC treated Bernie.
But a lot of Dems here in Arizona supported Rodney Glassman and Kyrsten Sinema, including Adelita, and both Rodney and Kyrsten are not even Dems anymore. What does that mean? IDK, but I was just following Meg's logic...
Anyway this piece really isnt about Adelita. Its about the secrecy and lack of serious consideration of a project where nobody is allowed to know or say anything all while obviously causing higher water and electricity rates to all of us. It appears to be totally inappropriate for a water guzzling electricity sucking project to be in a desert from the get-go! There are states that have so much water they use it to GET electricity but they want this project HERE?!
Voted for Adelita Grijalva and I wish her well ! You also supported Tulsi Gabbard! You opinion is invalid IMHO
For a very short window, Tulsi Gabbard didnt look bad and was an anti war candidate. The window closed though and poof! She was on the dark side, then the absolutely loco side. Now she will undoubtedly lose her job for actually presenting data to a madman.
I don't know what happened to her, but she was alright for a second, even challenging how the Clintons and DNC treated Bernie.
But a lot of Dems here in Arizona supported Rodney Glassman and Kyrsten Sinema, including Adelita, and both Rodney and Kyrsten are not even Dems anymore. What does that mean? IDK, but I was just following Meg's logic...
Adelita supported Rodney Glassman. Does that make her opinion invalid?