⚖️ Sheriff's Department Drama Masks Deeper Issues of Law Enforcement Accountability

🏛️ Power and Politics: The Sheriff's Department Civil War 🏥 Healthcare Access: Market Solutions vs. Human Rights

Based on the 10/23/24 Wake Up Tucson show on KVOI-1030AM.

🧠 Mindmap of today’s show

🙊 Notable quotes from the show

• "Chris Nanos has torn the sheriff's department asunder. It's him and his favorite commanders versus the rest of the department." - Anonymous retired PCSD deputy

• "For me, it was not only that I lost a son, um, my daughter-in-law turned against me. I lost my grandchildren, my great-grandchildren." - Sharon Jones, Gold Star Mother

• "The reality is hospitals are not losing money off of Medicare." - Chris Faddis on healthcare costs

• "You have places in the country that are trying to promote that non-clinicians can do abortions." - Chris Faddis discussing healthcare policy

---

⏮️ ICYMI: From the Last Show…

---

😽 Keepin’ It Simple Summary for Younger Readers
👧🏾✊🏾👦🏾

📻 The radio show talked about important things happening in our city, Tucson! 🏜️ There's a story about our local sheriff 👮 who's being mean to people who disagree with him - kind of like when a bully tries to scare other kids on the playground. They also talked to a very brave mom ❤️ who lost her soldier son and now helps other families like hers. The show discussed how going to the doctor 🏥 is getting more expensive for families, and some places in our city 🏙️ aren't as safe as they should be. A famous Mexican baseball player named Fernando Valenzuela ⚾ who made lots of Latino kids proud passed away. While the radio hosts talked about these problems, they didn't always explain why these things happen or how we could really fix them to help everyone in our community! 🌈

---

---

🗝️ Takeaways

• 🔄 Local conservative media perpetuates narratives that ignore systemic inequities

• 👮 Law enforcement leadership shows concerning patterns of retaliation and power abuse

• 💔 Military families, especially from marginalized communities, lack adequate support

• 🏥 Healthcare discussions focus on market solutions while ignoring systemic barriers

• 🗳️ Electoral politics reveal ongoing issues with voter access and representation

• 🌟 Cultural representation matters, as shown in reactions to Fernando Valenzuela's passing

---

⏬ Jump to the 🦉 Three Sonorans Commentary based on:

---

📻 What They Discussed

📡 Hour 1: The Politics of "Visiting" and Power

The Kelly "Visit" Controversy

The show's mockery of KGUN 9's framing that Senator Mark Kelly "visits" Southern Arizona reveals an important truth about political representation.

While the hosts approached this from a conservative angle criticizing Kelly, the deeper issue is how politicians of all parties often treat the borderlands as a place to "visit" rather than a community to genuinely serve. This reflects the broader disconnection between political representatives and the lived experiences of fronterizo communities.

The Cow Palace Saga

Dan Shearer's reporting on the Cow Palace closure represents more than just the loss of a local landmark - it symbolizes the ongoing neglect of rural and smaller communities in Southern Arizona.

The flood damage and subsequent legal battles highlight how government agencies' negligence disproportionately impacts working-class communities, particularly in areas with significant Latino populations.

The Nanos Controversy

The coverage of Sheriff Nanos's actions against political rivals deserves scrutiny through a social justice lens.

While the hosts focus on political drama, the real issue is how law enforcement leadership uses institutional power to suppress opposition, a pattern all too familiar in communities of color.

⭐ Hour 2: Gold Star Families and Political Manipulation

Gold Star Mothers

Sharon Jones's testimony about Gold Star families reveals the profound human cost of military service, particularly relevant to our Latino communities who have historically served in disproportionate numbers.

The discussion of support systems for Gold Star families highlights broader issues of how our society treats veterans and their families, especially those from marginalized communities.

The Phillips Controversy

Bill Phillips's attempts to undermine Lt. Heather Lappin's campaign reflects typical power structure dynamics, where establishment figures work to maintain control even at the cost of potential positive change in law enforcement leadership.

🏥 Hour 3: Community Health and Safety

Fernando Valenzuela Tribute

The discussion of Fernando Valenzuela's passing touched on his impact but missed an opportunity to fully explore his significance to the Latino community and his role in bridging cultural divides.

Valenzuela's story is intrinsically tied to the history of Chavez Ravine and the displacement of Mexican-American communities in Los Angeles.

Constable Race Concerns

The report of harassment in the constable race raises serious concerns about candidate behavior and voter intimidation, issues that historically have affected marginalized communities more severely.

Healthcare Access

Chris Faddis's presentation on healthcare alternatives, while well-intentioned, operates within the framework of privatized healthcare that has historically underserved communities of color. The discussion failed to address how systemic inequities in healthcare access disproportionately impact marginalized populations.

This hour-by-hour breakdown reveals how conservative media, while covering important local issues, often fails to acknowledge or address the systemic inequities and historical context that shape our community's challenges. Each topic deserves deeper examination through a lens of social justice and historical accountability.

👮 The Nanos Controversy: Power, Retaliation, and the Thin Blue Line

Unpacking the Sheriff's Department Civil War Through a Social Justice Lens

The Surface Narrative vs. Deeper Reality

The Wake Up Tucson coverage of Sheriff Chris Nanos's recent actions against his political opponent Heather Lappin and Aaron Cross reveals a troubling pattern of power abuse that goes beyond simple election-year politics. Let's examine what the conservative hosts missed in their analysis.

The Inciting Incident

According to the transcript, Nanos suspended Aaron Cross for wearing:

"a green shirt, golf shirt, khaki pants... there's a hat that doesn't, none of this says anything and handcuffs and he might've had a gun, but none of this is illegal."

This seemingly trivial dress code enforcement masks a deeper issue of selective punishment and political retaliation.

The Journalism Angle

The show's guest, Dan Shearer, revealed how Nanos attempted to weaponize media coverage:

"Nanos puts out this press release and in it, he says that he had learned that Lappin quote, colluded with a journalist giving him access to information for interviews with inmates."

Later, it was revealed that Lappin was simply facilitating legitimate journalistic access to examine jail conditions—a crucial oversight function in a democratic society.

The Pattern of Power Abuse

A retired Pima County sheriff's deputy's anonymous quote tells a deeper story:

"Chris Nanos has torn the sheriff's department asunder. It's him and his favorite commanders versus the rest of the department."

Analyzing Through a Progressive Lens

Several critical issues emerge that deserve deeper examination:

1. Abuse of Administrative Power

   • Using departmental regulations selectively as political weapons

   • Retaliating against internal criticism

   • Creating a culture of fear and silence

2. Attack on Transparency

   • Attempting to criminalize legitimate journalism

   • Using FBI referrals as intimidation tactics

   • Controlling narrative through selective information released

3. Impact on Community Trust

   • How leadership conflicts affect community policing

   • Disproportionate impact on marginalized communities

   • Erosion of accountability mechanisms

4. Systemic Issues

   • Pattern of retaliation against whistleblowers

   • Use of administrative powers to maintain political control

   • Resistance to reform efforts

The Arizona Luminaria Connection

Arizona Luminaria's involvement, described as "the voice for the voiceless" covering stories about marginalized communities, adds another layer to this controversy.

Their reporter, John Washington's investigation into jail conditions represents the kind of oversight that powerful figures often try to suppress.

The Bigger Picture

This controversy illustrates classic tactics used by power structures to maintain control:

• Weaponizing regulations against opponents

• Intimidating journalists and whistleblowers

• Creating false narratives about "collusion"

• Using administrative powers for political purposes

Impact on Reform Efforts

This situation demonstrates why police reform is so difficult to achieve:

• Internal critics face retaliation

• Transparency efforts are suppressed

• Power structures protect themselves

• Reform candidates face institutional resistance

The Cost to Community

While conservative media focuses on political drama, they miss how these power struggles impact:

• Jail conditions and inmate welfare

• Community trust in law enforcement

• Department morale and effectiveness

• Accountability and oversight

Conclusion

The Nanos controversy is not merely about personality conflicts or election politics - it's about how power structures resist change and accountability. It demonstrates why meaningful law enforcement reform requires more than just changing leadership; it requires dismantling systems that enable abuse of power and rebuilding with true community accountability at the center.

En la lucha por la justicia, necesitamos más que promesas - we need systemic change.

---

🦉 Three Sonorans Commentary

In examining today's Wake Up Tucson broadcast, we witness the typical conservative narrative that fails to address the root causes of systemic inequality in our community. Let's break down the key issues through a lens of social justice and historical context:

Law Enforcement and Power Dynamics

The Nanos controversy reveals more than just departmental drama - it exposes how law enforcement leadership resists accountability and transparency.

When Sheriff Nanos attacks Heather Lappin for facilitating journalism about jail conditions, he's not just targeting a political opponent; he's attempting to suppress investigation into conditions that disproportionately affect our communities of color.

The Military-Industrial Complex and Our Youth

Sharon Jones's heartbreaking testimony about losing her son in military service demands we ask: Why do our brown and poor youth disproportionately bear the burden of America's wars? While the conservative hosts honor Gold Star families, they fail to question the systems that create them.

Quote from Sharon Jones: "It's hard enough to lose one of your children... it's hard to lose most of your family."

Healthcare Inequity

The discussion about rising healthcare costs through a market-based lens completely ignores how our communities suffer most from lack of access.

When Chris Faddis promotes private healthcare solutions, we must ask: What about those who can't afford any option at all?

Public Safety and Community Investment

The show's discussion of crime focuses on symptoms while ignoring causes:

• Systemic poverty

• Lack of resources

• Historical disinvestment in communities of color

• Over-policing without community support

Cultural Representation

The passing of Fernando Valenzuela deserved deeper analysis of:

• The displacement of Mexican-American communities to build Dodger Stadium

• The significance of Mexican representation in Major League Baseball

• The ongoing struggle for respect and recognition in American sports

Infrastructure and Environmental Justice

The Cow Palace flooding story in Green Valley represents classic environmental racism:

"They had not been taking care of culverts where the water should have gone under bridges... some of these culverts hadn't been cleaned out in probably 20 years."

This neglect of infrastructure disproportionately impacts working-class and minority communities.

🎯 Behind the Headlines: Conservative Media's Attack on Indigenous Leadership in Elections

In today's dissection of Wake Up Tucson's coverage, we find a troubling pattern in their treatment of Pima County Recorder Gabriella Cázares-Kelly, the first Native American woman to hold this position in county history. The show's commentary reveals deeper patterns of bias and erasure that demand our attention.

The Surface Criticism

The hosts focused on operational issues, particularly sample ballot delays:

"So I did this on Monday, right? Monday, trigger alert Monday, the 21st... I get home after voting and... six o'clock. So I trundle out to the mailbox and there is my sample ballot just arrived... Early voting started on the 9th to 21st. So, you know, Bravo Pima County for that one."

Coded Language and Dog Whistles

The criticism quickly turned personal, with host Chris DeSimone stating:

"Remember, during the week she was wasting time pimping for Tim Waltz over at Palo Verde. Hi. She was at that loser panel with the young Democrats at the Tucson Young Professionals. I mean, she's doing everything but her job during one of the most crucial weeks of her job."

This language choice is not accidental. The use of terms like "pimping" and dismissive characterizations of community engagement reveal underlying biases against women of color in leadership positions.

The Missing Context

The show's coverage deliberately ignores several crucial factors:

1. Historical Underfunding

   • Chronic budget constraints in election offices

   • Legacy of resource deprivation in offices serving diverse communities

   • Impact of new election laws on administrative burden

2. Progressive Initiatives

   • Efforts to increase voter registration in underserved communities

   • Modernization of election systems

   • Enhanced accessibility measures

3. Systemic Challenges

   • Inherited infrastructure issues

   • Increased election complexity

   • Resource limitations

The Double Standard

The mockery continues with suggestions like:

"Following the city council's lead, why don't you just declare lack of a quorum and close the office up for the entire month of October?"

This sarcasm masks a common double standard: community engagement by conservative officials is termed "constituent service," while similar activities by progressive leaders of color are labeled as "wasting time."

Why This Matters

This coverage represents more than simple political criticism - it exemplifies how conservative media works to delegitimize leaders from marginalized communities who challenge traditional power structures. By focusing on operational details while ignoring broader context and achievements, they perpetuate narratives that undermine public trust in diverse leadership.

The Bigger Picture

When we examine this coverage through a progressive lens, we see:

1. Attempted Delegitimization

   • Use of coded language

   • Focus on minor operational issues

   • Dismissal of community engagement

2. Systemic Bias

   • Heightened scrutiny of leaders of color

   • Erasure of historical context

   • Ignorance of structural challenges

3. Impact on Democracy

   • Undermining trust in election administration

   • Discouraging diverse leadership

   • Perpetuating systemic inequities

Moving Forward

As progressive voices, we must:

• Call out coded language and bias

• Provide missing context and perspective

• Support leaders working to make democracy more accessible

• Challenge narratives that undermine diverse leadership

La lucha por la democracia continúa - The struggle for democracy continues

Remember: When conservative media attacks progressive leaders of color, it's rarely about the stated issues - it's about maintaining traditional power structures and resisting change that benefits marginalized communities.

---

If you enjoyed this article, buy us a cup of coffee! We 🤎☕‼️

---

👯 People Mentioned

Political Figures & Public Officials

• Chris Nanos - Current Pima County Sheriff

  • Subject of controversy over retaliation against political opponents

  • Quote about him from anonymous deputy: "Chris Nanos has torn the sheriff's department asunder. It's him and his favorite commanders versus the rest of the department."

  • Said about investigations into Lappin: "this all made amount to nothing"

• Heather Lappin - Republican candidate for Pima County Sheriff

  • Current subject of controversy with Nanos

  • Accused of "colluding with a journalist"

  • Allegedly helped facilitate legitimate jail interviews

• Mark Kelly - U.S. Senator from Arizona

  • Subject of mockery for "visiting" Southern Arizona despite supposedly living there

  • Lives "in Ellen Canto with his lovely wife at Broadway and country club"

• Gabriella Cázares-Kelly - Current Pima County Recorder

  • Criticized for late delivery of sample ballots

  • Mentioned as being "at that loser panel with the young Democrats at the Tucson Young Professionals"

• Rex Scott - Pima County figure

  • Described as one of the few still supporting Nanos: "Rex Scott and the deconceasingly brothers love Chris Nanos"

Media & Journalists

• Dan Shearer - Editor of Green Valley News

  • Provided coverage of Cow Palace closure and sheriff controversy

  • Conducted investigative reporting on culvert maintenance issues

• John Washington - Reporter for Arizona Luminaria

  • Investigating jail conditions

  • Subject of controversy over inmate phone call payments

• Becky Palak - Former Daily Star reporter, founder of Arizona Luminaria

  • Quoted regarding investigation into Washington's reporting

• Irene McKesson - Founder of Arizona Luminaria

  • Released statement defending their journalism practices

Community Members & Activists

• Sharon Jones - Gold Star Mother

  • Lost her son Darryl on March 4th, 2007 in Iraq

  • Powerful quote: "It's hard enough to lose one of your children... it's hard to lose most of your family"

  • Models for Gold Star mother statue at Evergreen Cemetery

• Bill Phillips - Former sheriff candidate

  • Retired Lieutenant from Pima County Sheriff's Department

  • Criticized for undermining Lappin's campaign after losing primary

Local Business/Community Figures

• Frank Bertolino - Owner of Cow Palace

  • Fighting with state over flood damage compensation

  • Quoted about demolishing building: "we're taking it down by the end of the year"

Cultural Figures

• Fernando Valenzuela - Legendary Dodgers pitcher who passed away

  • Discussed as cultural icon for Latino community

  • Noted for "cool looking up to the heavens wind up"

  • "Started the season eight and no with five shutouts and an ERA of a half a run"

Law Enforcement

• Aaron Cross - Law enforcement officer

  • Suspended by Nanos for dress code violations

  • Suspension described as politically motivated

• Daniel Roland - Constable for Justice Precinct One

  • Current constable running for re-election

• Mark Roosevelt - Constable candidate

  • Accused of stalking and harassment by Roland's wife

Healthcare

• Chris Faddis - Co-founder of Solidarity Health Share

  • Discussed healthcare costs and alternatives

  • Quote: "The reality is hospitals are not losing money off of Medicare"

---

🧐 Propaganda AI-nalysis

As a progressive Chicano journalist, it's crucial to deconstruct how "Wake Up Tucson" employs several classic conservative media tactics:

1. Framing Devices

• Uses personality-driven narratives to avoid systemic analysis

• Focuses on individual incidents rather than patterns of inequality

• Presents market-based solutions as the only viable options

• Employs "common sense" rhetoric that ignores historical context

2. Selective Coverage

• Criticizes local government without examining root causes

• Discusses crime without addressing socioeconomic factors

• Covers healthcare costs while ignoring racial and class disparities

• Mentions Valenzuela without exploring deeper cultural significance

3. Language and Tone

• Uses mockery of progressive politicians (Mark Kelly, Cázares-Kelly)

• Employs coded language about urban issues

• Frames public services as inherently inefficient

• Reduces complex social issues to simple management problems