๐ "Hostile Architecture" or Human Rights Violation? Tucson's Approach to Homelessness Sparks Debate
๐ Law & Disorder: Unpacking the Allegations Against Sheriff Nanos ๐ธ Your Tax Dollars at Work: Breaking Down Pima County's Migrant Aid Spending
Based on the 9/23/24 Wake Up Tucson Show on KVOI-1030AM.
Chris DeSimone: โRex Scottโฆ he crushes kids.โ
๐ Notable quotes from the show
"If you're a business owner or homeowner who is putting fencing, barbed wire, ribbon wire to keep people just from going into your place and destroying your $28,000 air conditioner on top of your building, right? You're the bastard with hostile architects." - Chris DeSimone, discussing homelessness and "hostile architecture"
"FEMA money was 117 million of federal dollars that have blown through Pima County to enable over probably about a half million illegal immigrants." - Chris DeSimone, on federal funding for migrant aid
"Rex Scott supported closing down schools and restaurants and different things like this. Right. So he crushes kids." - Chris DeSimone, criticizing a local politician's stance on COVID-19 measures
"We offer food, drinks, things like that as well. And we definitely want your group to help you promote it in whatever way is working for you." - Mark from Tucson Games and Gadgets, discussing community events at his store
โฎ๏ธ ICYMI: From the Last Showโฆ
๐ฝ Keepinโ It Simple Summary for Younger Readers
๐ง๐พโ๐พ๐ฆ๐พ
๐ป On a radio show, grown-ups talked about some big problems in Tucson. They discussed people without homes ๐ and how the city is trying to stop them from sleeping in public places. They also talked about a police chief ๐ฎ who might have done some bad things. The city got a lot of money ๐ฐ to help people coming from other countries, but some people think it's too much. A new restaurant ๐ is opening, which is exciting for some people. Lastly, they talked about a store that sells games ๐ฒ and helps people make friends. The grown-ups had different ideas about how to solve these problems.
๐๏ธ Takeaways
๐ Tucson's approach to homelessness focuses on "hostile architecture" rather than addressing root causes
๐ฎ Sheriff Nanos faces allegations of misconduct, raising questions about law enforcement accountability
๐ฐ Pima County received $117 million in FEMA funds for migrant aid, sparking debate about resource allocation
๐ New restaurant "Ham Bones" opens, highlighting local business development and potential gentrification
๐ฒ Local game stores create inclusive community spaces, offering an alternative to political divisions
๐ป What They Discussed
๐๏ธ Wake Up Tucson: A Conservative Voice in the Old Pueblo
On Monday, September 25, 2023, the conservative radio show "Wake Up Tucson" aired another episode hosted by Chris DeSimone. The show featured several guests and regular contributors, including JoAnn di Filippo, who discussed local politics and county issues; Brother Joe, who called in to talk about horse racing; and Mark from Tucson Games and Gadgets, who shared insights about his local business and community events. The show covered many topics, from local politics and homelessness to new business openings and entertainment, all filtered through a distinctly conservative lens.
๐ Homelessness in Tucson: The Debate Over "Hostile Architecture" and Public Policy
The show dedicated significant time to discussing homelessness in Tucson, focusing on a recent report about the demographics of the homeless population. The hosts' interpretation of this data revealed a perspective that largely blamed individuals for their circumstances, with a particular emphasis on substance abuse as a primary cause of homelessness.
Chris DeSimone introduced the concept of "hostile architecture," framing it as a necessary measure for business owners to protect their property.
He stated, "If you're a business owner or homeowner who is putting fencing, barbed wire, ribbon wire to keep people just from going into your place and destroying your $28,000 air conditioner on top of your building, right? You're the bastard with hostile architects."
This statement reflects a view that prioritizes property protection over addressing the root causes of homelessness.
The hosts analyzed statistics from the report, noting the homeless individuals' education levels and employment status. They interpreted the data to suggest that only a small percentage of homeless people are families or individuals who have fallen on hard times, with the majority being single adults with substance abuse issues. This interpretation, however, fails to account for the complex and varied pathways to homelessness, including mental health issues, economic factors, and systemic inequalities.
The discussion also touched on using public funds to address homelessness, with the hosts expressing skepticism about the effectiveness of current approaches. They criticized what they perceived as a permissive attitude towards homeless encampments and drug use, arguing for stricter enforcement of laws and regulations.
This show segment highlights the ongoing debate in Tucson and many other cities about how to address homelessness effectively. While the hosts' perspective emphasizes personal responsibility and law enforcement, it largely overlooks systemic factors contributing to homelessness and the potential for comprehensive, compassionate solutions.
๐ฎ Law Enforcement Accountability: The Sheriff Nanos Controversy
A significant portion of the show was dedicated to discussing ongoing controversies surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos. The hosts, particularly JoAnn di Filippo, delved into the details of a recent Board of Supervisors meeting where the sheriff's conduct was discussed.
The controversy centers around allegations of misconduct within the Sheriff's Department and questions about Nanos' leadership. Di Filippo highlighted that the Arizona Attorney General's office had identified potential policy violations by the department. She criticized the response of some county supervisors, particularly Rex Scott, who questioned whether it was the board's role to investigate the sheriff.
Di Filippo quoted Scott as saying, "I don't see what our role is," and strongly disagreed with this stance. She argued that public safety is a key responsibility of the Board of Supervisors, regardless of whether the sheriff is an elected official. This perspective emphasizes the importance of checks and balances in local government and the need for accountability in law enforcement.
The hosts discussed a motion by Supervisor Christy to formally request a response from Sheriff Nanos, either in writing or in person, regarding the allegations. This motion passed with a 3-2 vote, with Supervisors Christy, Lee, and Heinz in favor and Supervisors Grijalva and Scott opposed.
Despite the ongoing controversies, Chris DeSimone criticized Rex Scott's endorsement of Nanos for re-election. He quoted Scott as saying he wouldn't vote for any Republican who doesn't publicly reject Donald Trump. He used this to paint Scott as prioritizing partisan politics over local issues and public safety.
This show segment highlights the complex interplay between local law enforcement, elected officials, and political parties. It raises important questions about accountability in public office and the role of supervisory boards in overseeing law enforcement agencies. However, the hosts' partisan framing of the issue may oversimplify the complexities involved in local governance and law enforcement oversight.
๐ฐ Federal Funding for Migrant Aid: A Contentious Issue in Pima County
The show addressed the controversial topic of federal funding for migrant aid in Pima County, focusing on the significant amount of money allocated through FEMA.
Chris DeSimone stated, "FEMA money was 117 million of federal dollars that have blown through Pima County to enable over probably about a half million illegal immigrants."
This framing of the issue presents the funding as excessive and potentially misused, reflecting a skeptical view of immigration and asylum policies.
The hosts discussed a chart presented at a recent Board of Supervisors meeting that detailed the allocation of these funds. They noted that the chart only showed funding from 2021 onwards, questioning what other funding sources might have been used before this period.
A significant point of contention was the terminology used to describe the recipients of this aid. The hosts highlighted a shift in language from "legally processed asylum seekers" (LPAs) to "non-citizen migrants." They viewed this change as potentially obfuscating the legal status of those receiving aid and questioned the motivations behind such linguistic shifts.
The discussion touched on the broader implications of this funding, with the hosts expressing concern about the impact on local resources and the potential for these funds to incentivize further illegal immigration. They criticized the lack of transparency in how these funds are being used and questioned the long-term sustainability of such aid programs.
This segment reflects the ongoing national debate about immigration policy and the role of local governments in addressing the needs of migrants and asylum seekers. The hosts' perspective aligns with a more restrictive view of immigration, emphasizing concerns about resource allocation and the impact on local communities. However, this framing largely overlooks the humanitarian aspects of the aid and the complex factors driving migration to the United States.
๐ Hammbones: A New Local Restaurant Opens Its Doors
On a lighter note, the show discussed the grand opening of a new restaurant called Ham Bones, owned by CJ Ham. Chris DeSimone expressed enthusiasm for the opening, describing his experience at a soft opening event: "I got the smothered pork chops and hand bones. That and the gravy was just beautiful."
The hosts described Ham Bones as a "meat and three" joint, a style of restaurant common in the Southern United States where customers choose one meat dish and three side dishes. They highlighted menu items such as smothered pork chops, lemon sole, porky collard greens, and desserts like peach raspberry cobbler and banana pudding.
DeSimone announced that the official opening would feature a "ribbon slicing" ceremony instead of a traditional ribbon cutting, emphasizing the chef-driven nature of the restaurant. He encouraged listeners to attend the opening and support the new business.
While the hosts presented the restaurant opening as an entirely positive development for the community, it's worth noting that they did not discuss any potential impacts on existing local businesses or considerations of gentrification. The enthusiasm for this new business reflects a pro-development stance common in conservative discourse about local economics.
๐ฒ Tucson Games and Gadgets: Fostering Community Through Gaming
The show featured a segment with Mark, the owner of Tucson Games and Gadgets, discussing his business and its role in the community. Mark's stores in various malls around Tucson offer more than just retail space for games and collectibles; they provide venues for community gatherings and events.
Mark described the various offerings at his locations, including the Caffeine Cauldron, a themed coffee shop, and the Short Rest Tavern, a space for gaming and socializing. He emphasized the inclusive nature of these spaces, stating, "We offer food, drinks, things like that as well. And we definitely want your group will help you promote it in whatever way is working for you."
The discussion touched on the events hosted at the stores, including trivia nights, role-playing game sessions, and gatherings for various fan communities. Mark highlighted the effort to create welcoming environments for diverse groups of people, reflecting a commitment to community building through shared interests.
The hosts and Mark also discussed the upcoming holiday shopping season and the products available at the stores, emphasizing the potential for family-friendly gaming options. This segment presented a positive view of local business as a force for community cohesion and economic vitality.
While the discussion was largely apolitical, it aligns with conservative values of entrepreneurship and community-building through private enterprise rather than government intervention. The emphasis on creating spaces for social interaction and shared interests presents an alternative model for addressing social isolation and community fragmentation.
๐ณ๏ธ Local Politics and Governance: A Conservative Critique
Throughout the show, the hosts offered commentary on various aspects of local politics and governance in Pima County, often from a distinctly conservative perspective. Their criticisms focused on officials and policies they perceived as liberal or progressive.
A significant target of their critique was Rex Scott, a county supervisor.
Chris DeSimone accused Scott of hypocrisy and poor governance, stating, "Rex Scott supported closing down schools and restaurants and different things like this. Right. So he crushes kids."
This comment reflects a common conservative criticism of COVID-19 mitigation measures, framing them as unnecessarily harmful to the economy and education.
The hosts also discussed taxation and government spending issues, criticizing what they saw as excessive taxation and misallocation of resources. They expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of various government programs and initiatives, particularly those related to social services and public health.
The show touched on election integrity issues, reflecting national conservative concerns about voter fraud and election security. While specific details were not provided in the transcript, the mention of these issues aligns with broader conservative narratives about the need for stricter voting laws and increased scrutiny of election processes.
Throughout these discussions, the hosts presented a vision of local governance emphasizing limited government intervention, lower taxes, and stricter law enforcement. Their critiques of progressive policies and officials reflect a broader conservative worldview prioritizing individual responsibility and market-driven solutions over government-led social programs.
This political commentary provides insight into the conservative perspective on local governance in Pima County, highlighting the ideological divides that shape debates about public policy and resource allocation in the community.
๐ฆ Three Sonorans Commentary
The Wake Up Tucson radio show presents a troubling narrative that perpetuates harmful stereotypes and promotes policies that further marginalize vulnerable communities in Tucson. The hosts' discussion of homelessness, immigration, and local politics reveals a deeply problematic worldview that prioritizes property rights and punitive measures over human dignity and compassionate solutions.
The show's framing of homelessness as primarily a result of individual failings, particularly substance abuse, ignores the complex systemic factors that contribute to housing insecurity. The hosts' endorsement of "hostile architecture" โ design elements intended to prevent homeless individuals from using public spaces โ is a cruel and short-sighted approach that criminalizes poverty without addressing its root causes. This perspective fails to acknowledge the role of economic inequality, lack of affordable housing, inadequate mental health services, and other structural issues in perpetuating homelessness.
Chris DeSimone's statement, "If you're a business owner or homeowner who is putting fencing, barbed wire, ribbon wire to keep people just from going into your place and destroying your $28,000 air conditioner on top of your building, right? You're the bastard with hostile architects," reveals a callous disregard for the humanity of those experiencing homelessness.
This rhetoric dehumanizes vulnerable individuals and justifies policies that exacerbate their suffering rather than providing meaningful assistance.
The show's discussion of federal funding for migrant aid is equally concerning. DeSimone's characterization of the $117 million in FEMA funds as "enabling" undocumented immigration grossly misrepresents the nature and purpose of this humanitarian aid. This framing ignores the dire circumstances that drive migration and the legal rights of asylum seekers. It's a perspective that prioritizes xenophobic talking points over human rights and international obligations.
The hosts' criticism of local officials, particularly Rex Scott, for supporting COVID-19 mitigation measures demonstrates a dangerous disregard for public health. DeSimone's claim that Scott "crushes kids" by supporting school closures is a hyperbolic and misleading characterization of efforts to protect community health during a global pandemic.
The discussion of law enforcement accountability, particularly regarding Sheriff Nanos, raises important questions about oversight and transparency. However, the hosts' partisan framing of the issue undermines the potential for a substantive dialogue about systemic problems in policing and the need for meaningful reform.
Amidst these serious discussions of social issues and human rights, the show's pivot to topics like the opening of a new restaurant, "Hammbones," and the community-building efforts of a local game store creates a jarring disconnect. While local businesses play an important role in community vitality, the juxtaposition of these lighter topics with the grave issues of homelessness and immigration highlights the hosts' privilege and inability to grasp the urgency of the crises facing many Tucson residents.
This disconnect is particularly striking in the enthusiastic description of "Hammbones" menu itemsโ"smothered pork chops and hand bones. That and the gravy was just beautiful."
This stands in stark contrast to the earlier dehumanizing discussion of homeless individuals and immigrants. The ability to casually transition from topics of human suffering to culinary indulgence reveals a profound lack of empathy and perspective.
Similarly, while Tucson Games and Gadgets' community-building efforts are commendable, their focus on leisure activities and consumer spaces as solutions to social division ignores the deeper systemic issues that create and perpetuate inequality in our community.
As progressives, we must challenge these harmful narratives and advocate for policies that address the root causes of homelessness, provide humane support for immigrants and asylum seekers, and promote genuine accountability in law enforcement. We must create a Tucson that values all its residents, regardless of their housing status or country of origin and prioritizes human dignity over property rights and profit.
The stark contrast between discussions of human suffering and casual consumerism on this show highlights the need for a more compassionate, equitable approach to community development โ ensuring all residents can survive and thrive in Tucson. It's time to reject the politics of division and scarcity promoted by shows like Wake Up Tucson and embrace a vision of Tucson that is genuinely inclusive, just, and humane for all its residents.
If you enjoyed this article, buy us a cup of coffee! Seriously, we ๐คโ!
๐ฏ People Mentioned
Chris DeSimone: Host of the show, made numerous controversial statements
JoAnn di Filippo: Co-host or regular contributor, discussed local politics
Sheriff Chris Nanos: Subject of controversy, not directly quoted
Rex Scott: Local politician criticized by the hosts, quoted as saying "I don't see what our role is."
CJ Hamm: Owner of the new "Ham Bones" restaurant, not directly quoted
Mark: Owner of Tucson Games and Gadgets, discussed his business
Steve Christy: Local politician mentioned as questioning the Sheriff
Jan Lesher: Mentioned as responding to questions about terminology for migrants
Dr. Garcia: Mentioned as a deputy county administrator
Supervisor Lee: Mentioned as supporting Steve Christie's motion
Supervisor Hieinz: Mentioned as supporting Steve Christie's motion
Adelita: Mentioned in the context of county supervisors' discussions
Heather Lappin: Mentioned as a political candidate
Donald Trump: Mentioned in the context of local political discussions
Brother Joe: Mentioned as a regular contributor discussing horse racing
Matt Neely: Mentioned as part of the radio show team
๐ง Propaganda AI-nalysis
The show employs several propaganda techniques:
Name-calling: Using derogatory terms for homeless individuals and political opponents
Scapegoating: Blaming immigrants and homeless people for societal issues
Simplification: Reducing complex issues to simple, often binary, narratives
Appeal to fear: Emphasizing threats to safety and property
Bandwagon: Implying that the hosts' views represent the majority
Card stacking: Selectively presenting information to support their viewpoint
Testimonial: Using local business owners to support their economic perspective
Transfer: Associating local issues with national conservative talking points