🏥 Proposition 139: Protecting Women's Health or "Infanticide Without Limits"?
🎧 County Communications Department Expansion Raises Eyebrows 👶 The Human Cost of Abortion: A Whistleblower's Tale 💵 Housing Trust Fund: New Taxes on the Horizon?
Based on the 9/9/24 Wake Up Tucson Show on KVOI-1030AM in Tucson, AZ.
The hosts' selective approach to religious teachings – embracing the Church's stance on abortion while ignoring its teachings on social justice and welcoming immigrants – exposes the hypocrisy at the heart of much right-wing religious rhetoric. Moreover, if religious institutions insist on actively shaping public policy, perhaps it's time to reconsider their tax-exempt status.
Also from the show:
"Is Raul Grijalva alive? That's what I want to know. The man has missed hundreds of votes in Congress. I know he's sick. I understand he's sick. I thought that he, you know, this is life."
🧠🗺️ Mind Map of the Show 🗣️🎙️
😽 Keepin’ It Simple Summary for Younger Readers
👧🏾✊🏾👦🏾
📻 On a radio show, grown-ups talked about some big problems. 😷 They didn't like the idea of the county making a podcast. 🗳️ They talked about voting on a new rule about babies, which made them upset. 👶 A lady told a sad story about working at a place that helps women not have babies. 🏥 They also didn't like how some people come into the country without permission. 🙏 They wished church leaders would talk more about these things. It was all very serious grown-up stuff!
🗝️ Takeaways
🎙️ Pima County is exploring creating a podcast, which the hosts view as wasteful
🗳️ Proposition 139 would enshrine abortion rights in the Arizona constitution, removing many restrictions
👥 The hosts advocate for more restrictions on immigration and critique "open borders" policies
⛪ There is frustration among conservative Catholics that Church leaders aren't more vocal on abortion
💰 The hosts criticize potential new taxes to fund affordable housing initiatives
📚 Topics Discussed
🎙️ Pima County's Podcast Predicament: Waste or Innovation?
The host of Wake Up Tucson, Chris DeSimone, and his regular guest, Dr. JoAnn di Filippo, took aim at Pima County's recent initiative to explore the creation of a county-sponsored podcast. The discussion centered around a survey sent out by the county seeking input on potential podcast topics, formats, and listening habits.
DeSimone expressed skepticism and derision towards the idea, framing it as an unnecessary expansion of the county's already sizable communications department.
He quipped, "Classic Pima County. Good job, Mark Evans and the $2 million department. You have no idea what you... You didn't even get your dates right."
This comment reflects a broader conservative critique of government spending on what they perceive as non-essential services.
The hosts encouraged their listeners to participate in the survey but with a clear agenda to skew the results towards conservative viewpoints. They suggested that listeners recommend themselves or other conservative voices as potential podcast hosts or guests. This call to action demonstrates the ongoing struggle for ideological influence in local government communications.
The discussion about the podcast survey served as a springboard for broader criticisms of Pima County's governance and spending priorities. The hosts portrayed the initiative as emblematic of what they see as wasteful and out-of-touch government behavior, particularly in light of other pressing issues facing the county, such as housing affordability and infrastructure needs.
🗳️ Proposition 139: The Abortion Rights Battleground in Arizona
A significant portion of the show was dedicated to discussing Proposition 139, a ballot measure that would enshrine abortion rights in the Arizona state constitution. The hosts vehemently opposed this proposition, characterizing it in stark and controversial terms as "infanticide without limits."
The centerpiece of this segment was an interview with Myra Rodriguez, a former Planned Parenthood employee who now works with CatholicVote.org to oppose abortion rights. Rodriguez shared graphic and emotionally charged accounts of her experiences working in abortion clinics, describing what she claimed were unsafe practices and the emotional toll of the work.
Chris DeSimone outlined several aspects of Proposition 139 that he found particularly objectionable:
The potential for abortions to be performed late in pregnancy
The elimination of parental consent requirements for minors seeking abortions
The possibility of taxpayer funding for abortions
The removal of restrictions on partial-birth abortions
The elimination of mandatory ultrasounds before abortions
The hosts framed the proposition as an extreme measure that goes beyond protecting women's health and instead removes necessary safeguards and regulations. They argued that the language of the proposition is intentionally deceptive, claiming it allows for more extensive abortion access than its proponents publicly admit.
The discussion also touched on the role of the Catholic Church in opposing the measure, with the hosts expressing frustration at what they perceived as insufficient vocal opposition from Church leadership. This point highlighted the intersection of religious beliefs and political activism in the abortion debate.
🏠 Housing Trust Fund: Pima County's Controversial Funding Quest
The show delved into a recent Pima County Administrator Jan Lesher memo regarding potential funding options for a county housing trust fund. This discussion highlighted the tensions between addressing affordable housing needs and increased taxation and government spending concerns.
Dr. di Filippo broke down the various funding options presented in the memo:
A general fund primary property tax increase
A general sales tax
General obligation bonds
The hosts were particularly critical of the potential property tax increase, which the memo framed as a modest cost to homeowners. Dr. DeFilippo argued that this framing was misleading, as it didn't account for potential changes in property valuations over time.
The discussion touched on the regressive nature of sales and property taxes, with the hosts expressing concern about the impact on low-income residents. They questioned the effectiveness of government-led initiatives to address housing affordability, suggesting that such programs often fail to achieve their stated goals while increasing the tax burden on citizens.
This segment reflected broader conservative skepticism towards government-led social programs and tax increases, even when aimed at addressing acknowledged community needs like affordable housing.
🇲🇽 Border Battles: Immigration Rhetoric and Local Impacts
Throughout the show, immigration and border security were recurring themes, with the hosts criticizing what they characterized as lax border policies and the local impacts of illegal immigration.
The discussion included references to reports of crimes allegedly committed by immigrants in various U.S. cities. The hosts cited anecdotal evidence of disruptive behavior, including a particularly vivid claim about immigrants "decapitating ducks in parks and eating them" in Springfield, Ohio. While shocking, such claims were presented without verification or context, potentially contributing to fearmongering about immigrant communities.
Dr. di Filippo presented statistics claiming that "native-born jobs are down 1.3 million, but foreign-born employment is up by 1.2 million."
This framing suggests a zero-sum view of employment, where immigrant success is portrayed as coming at the expense of native-born workers. However, this simplistic interpretation fails to account for broader economic trends, labor market dynamics, and the complex contributions of immigrants to the U.S. economy.
The hosts were particularly critical of Democratic politicians, accusing them of flip-flopping on border security issues for political gain. They discussed Bernie Sanders's comments about Kamala Harris, interpreting them as an admission of political opportunism on immigration and other issues.
This segment reflected the show's alignment with hardline conservative positions on immigration, emphasizing enforcement and restriction over more nuanced approaches to immigration policy.
⛪ Faith on the Frontlines: The Catholic Church's Role in Political Discourse
A notable thread throughout the discussion was the role of the Catholic Church in political discourse, particularly regarding abortion and immigration issues. The hosts expressed frustration with what they perceived as a lack of vocal opposition to Proposition 139 from Catholic bishops in Arizona.
Chris DeSimone pointedly asked, "Where the hell are the Catholic bishops in Arizona on this one? Because they are amazingly quiet."
This comment reflected a desire for religious leaders to take a more active role in opposing abortion rights, framing it as a moral imperative for the Church.
The discussion highlighted a perceived inconsistency in the Church's political engagement. The hosts noted that Catholic leaders have been vocal on immigration issues, advocating for more welcoming policies towards immigrants and refugees. However, they criticized the Church for not being equally outspoken on abortion, which they view as a paramount moral issue.
This segment underscored the complex relationship between religious institutions and political activism in the United States. While the hosts called for greater Church involvement in opposing abortion rights, they did not address the potential church-state separation issues that such involvement might raise.
The conversation also touched on the challenges faced by individual priests in addressing controversial political issues from the pulpit. One suggestion was that parish members pressure their local clergy to speak out more forcefully against Proposition 139.
Perhaps it’s also time to tax churches if they want to get involved with the State.
🗳️ Beyond the Headlines: The Crucial Importance of Down-Ballot Races
Throughout the show, the hosts emphasized the importance of local elections and down-ballot races, particularly in the upcoming election cycle. While high-profile races often dominate media coverage, local contests can significantly impact communities.
Chris DeSimone highlighted the importance of school board elections, urging listeners to pay attention to these often-overlooked races. The hosts suggested that conservative voters needed to be engaged in these local contests to counter progressive influences in education policy.
The discussion touched on the potential for a two-page ballot in the upcoming election, with voters facing 70 to 80 choices between candidates, judge retentions, and ballot propositions. The hosts emphasized the need for voters to be informed and engaged down the ballot, not just on headline races.
This segment reflected a broader conservative strategy to build influence from the ground up, recognizing that local offices and seemingly minor ballot measures can significantly impact policy and governance. The hosts' emphasis on these races suggests a recognition that political change often begins at the local level and that engaged voters can have a disproportionate impact in lower-turnout local elections.
🌵 Three Sonorans Commentary
🔥 Wake Up Tucson: A Symphony of Misinformation and Bigotry
In the latest episode of "Wake Up Tucson," host Chris DeSimone and Dr. di Filippo once again demonstrated why conservative talk radio remains a bastion of regressive ideology and thinly veiled discrimination. From their fear-mongering about immigration to their dangerously misguided stance on reproductive rights, the show was a masterclass in how to spread misinformation and stoke cultural divisions.
🤰 Reproductive Rights Under Attack: The Truth About Proposition 139
The hosts' discussion of Proposition 139, which would enshrine abortion rights in the Arizona constitution, was nothing short of appalling. Their characterization of this crucial protection for women's healthcare as "infanticide without limits" is not only factually incorrect but deeply offensive to the countless women who face difficult reproductive decisions.
Chris DeSimone's claim that the proposition "allows for abortions up till the moment of birth" is a classic right-wing scare tactic with no basis in reality. Like most abortion rights legislation, Proposition 139 includes provisions for protecting the life and health of the mother in late-term pregnancies, which are exceedingly rare and almost always involve severe medical complications.
The interview with Myra Rodriguez, a former Planned Parenthood employee turned anti-choice activist, was a masterpiece of emotional manipulation. While Rodriguez's personal experiences shouldn't be dismissed, it's crucial to recognize that her anecdotes do not represent the reality of safe, legal abortion care provided by trained medical professionals across the country.
As progressives, we must stand firm in our support for reproductive rights. Proposition 139 is not about promoting abortion but about protecting the fundamental right of individuals to make their own healthcare decisions without government interference.
🇲🇽 Immigration Hysteria: Demonizing the Vulnerable
The show's treatment of immigration issues was a textbook example of xenophobic fear-mongering. By focusing on isolated incidents of alleged crimes committed by immigrants, the hosts perpetuate harmful stereotypes that have long been used to justify oppressive policies against communities of color.
Dr. di Filippo's claim that "Native-born jobs are down 1.3 million, but foreign-born employment is up by 1.2 million" is a classic case of using statistics to mislead. This simplistic framing ignores the complex realities of job creation, skill gaps, and demographic shifts that shape employment patterns. It also conveniently overlooks the countless studies showing the positive economic impacts of immigration.
The hosts' rhetoric about "illegal Haitians" causing problems in various cities is particularly disturbing.
"Springfield, Ohio, right? Residents go off at city commission meetings as Haitian illegals run wild and flip cars. You're going to love this one. Decapitate ducks in parks and eat them."
This kind of language dehumanizes people seeking a better life and ignores the historical and geopolitical factors that drive migration. As the descendants of immigrants ourselves, we should be working to create a more just and humane immigration system, not demonizing those who come to our shores in search of opportunity.
🏠 Housing Justice: More Than Just a Trust Fund
While the hosts quickly criticized Pima County's efforts to create a housing trust fund, they offered no solutions to our communities' very real affordability crisis. Their dismissal of potential funding mechanisms as "regressive" rings hollow when considered alongside their support for policies that consistently favor the wealthy over working families.
True progressives understand that addressing housing affordability requires a multifaceted approach, including funding mechanisms like trust funds, zoning reform, tenant protections, and a commitment to combating systemic racism in housing policy. The hosts' knee-jerk opposition to any government intervention in the housing market shows a callous disregard for the struggles of low-income families and individuals.
⛪ The Separation of Church and State: A Principle Under Threat
Perhaps most concerning was the hosts' call for greater involvement of religious institutions in political matters. Their frustration with Catholic bishops for not being more vocal in opposing Proposition 139 reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the importance of separating church and state.
While individuals are free to let their faith inform their political views, using the power of religious institutions to influence legislation is a dangerous path that threatens the rights of all those who may not share those particular religious beliefs. The hosts' selective approach to religious teachings – embracing the Church's stance on abortion while ignoring its teachings on social justice and welcoming immigrants – exposes the hypocrisy at the heart of much right-wing religious rhetoric.
Moreover, if religious institutions insist on actively shaping public policy, perhaps it's time to reconsider their tax-exempt status. The principle of separation of church and state is not just about protecting the state from religious influence but also about protecting religious institutions from state control. However, when churches actively engage in political campaigning or attempt to influence legislation, they blur this crucial line. If religious leaders want their institutions to function as political entities, they should be prepared to forgo the financial benefits of tax exemption that come with their current status. After all, you can't have your communion wafer and eat it too.
This is not to say that religious voices should be silenced in the public square, but rather that there must be a clear distinction between religious individuals' personal political activities and religious organizations' institutional power. By maintaining this separation, we protect both the integrity of our democratic processes and religious institutions' independence.
🗳️ The Importance of Local Engagement
If there was one point on which the hosts agreed, it was the importance of local elections and down-ballot races. However, while they see these contests as opportunities to advance a regressive agenda, we must view them as crucial battlegrounds for progressive values.
School board elections, county supervisor races, and local ballot measures may not grab headlines, but they impact our daily lives immensely. It's in these local arenas that we can push for equitable education policies, responsible land use, and community-oriented policing reforms.
🌟 The Fight for a Just Society Continues
Shows like "Wake Up Tucson" remind us of our challenges in building a more just and equitable society. Their rhetoric of division, their disdain for the vulnerable, and their willful ignorance of systemic inequalities are symptoms of a broader conservative worldview that seeks to maintain outdated power structures at the expense of progress.
As progressives, Latinos, and compassionate human beings, we must continue to fight this tide of misinformation and bigotry. We must advocate for policies that uplift all community members, regardless of their background or circumstances. We must stand firm in defending reproductive rights, push for humane immigration reform, fight for affordable housing, and work tirelessly to elect representatives who share these values.
The road ahead is long, but with persistence, solidarity, and a commitment to truth and justice, we can create the equitable society we all deserve. Let the fear-mongers of "Wake Up Tucson" serve not as a source of despair, but as motivation to work even harder for the change we wish to see in our communities and our world.
👩🏼🤝👨🏾 People Mentioned
Chris DeSimone
Host of Wake Up Tucson
Conservative commentator
Strongly opposes Proposition 139 and criticizes Democratic policies on immigration and abortion
Quote: "This allows for abortions up till the moment of birth. Okay? It also eliminates the necessity for parental consent."
Dr. D (Dr. di Filippo)
Co-host or frequent guest on Wake Up Tucson
Provides commentary on local politics and policy issues
Quote: "Look at the employment stats; that's okay. Native-born jobs are down 1.3 million, but foreign-born employment is up by 1.2 million."
Myra Rodriguez
Former Planned Parenthood employee for 17 years
Now works with CatholicVote.org and advocates against abortion
Shared personal experiences from working in abortion clinics
Quote: "Daily, we witness women getting perforated in utero or other main organs. And that's the first thing I've been telling women, abortions are safe."
Jan Lesher
Pima County Administrator
Mentioned in context of memos about county initiatives and potential new taxes
Mark Evans
Seemingly works in Pima County communications
Criticized by hosts for potential podcast initiative
Steve Christy
Pima County Supervisor
Mentioned as important for blocking potential sales tax increase
Kamala Harris
Vice President of the United States
Criticized for perceived changes in stance on fracking and abortion
Bernie Sanders
U.S. Senator
Mentioned for comments about Kamala Harris's campaign rhetoric
Paraphrased quote: "She's trying to be pragmatic and doing what she think is right in order to win an election."
Bishop Dolan
Catholic bishop in Arizona
Mentioned in context of Church's response to Proposition 139
👁️ Propaganda AI-nalysis
Propaganda messages:
Abortion is equivalent to murder or "infanticide"
Illegal immigration is causing crime and social problems in American cities
Democratic politicians are lying about their positions to get elected
The Catholic Church should be more vocal in opposing abortion rights
Pima County government is wasteful and considering unnecessary tax increases
Overt messages:
Proposition 139 should be opposed as it removes restrictions on abortion
Illegal immigration is a crisis that needs to be addressed
Local elections and down-ballot races are important for conservatives to win
The Catholic Church leadership is not doing enough to oppose abortion
Hidden messages:
Women cannot be trusted to make their own healthcare decisions
Immigrants are a threat to American society and jobs
Progressive policies are harmful to the economy and social fabric
Religious beliefs should dictate public policy
Hidden opinions:
Abortion is never justified and should be completely illegal
Immigration should be severely restricted or halted
Government initiatives to address housing affordability are misguided
Conservative religious values should guide legislation and policy
Claims made:
Proposition 139 allows for abortions up until the moment of birth
Illegal immigrants are committing crimes like decapitating ducks in public parks
Native-born employment is down while foreign-born employment is up
Pima County is considering new taxes that will burden low-income residents
Planned Parenthood clinics are unsafe and cause harm to women
If you enjoyed this article, buy us a cup of coffee!
Previous Show:
 | A guest post by
|