🎓 U of A Under Fire: Conservative Radio Show Claims Democratic "Indoctrination"

🚧 Building Walls, Breaking Trust: Brandon Judd's Border Security Narrative 🗳️ Ballot Boxing: Rachel Jones Takes On University Democratic Organizing

Based on the 10/22/24 Winn Tucson show on KVOI-1030AM.

🙊 Notable quotes from the show

• Brandon Judd on border policy: "We could have controlled the border with going with policies that they said that they were willing to do." Context: Criticizing Biden administration while promoting Trump-era policies

• Dennis Wilenchik on AG Mayes: "...we have an attorney general that was elected by 228 votes, apparently, that sees it as her business to weaponize..." Context: Defending Cochise County election denial cases

• Rachel Jones on universities: "Our universities, they are indoctrinating children. They're not teaching them and we should pull funds from them." Context: Reacting to U of A Democratic voter outreach

---

⏮️ ICYMI: From the Last Show…

---

😽 Keepin’ It Simple Summary for Younger Readers
👧🏾✊🏾👦🏾

📻 The Winn Tucson radio show talked about some big problems in Arizona 🌵. They discussed how people cross the border 🚶‍♀️, how we vote 🗳️, and what students learn in college 🎓. Some people want to make it harder for families to come to America, even when they need help 😢. The show also talked about how students should be able to choose who to vote for without being told what to do 💭. It's important to understand these issues because they affect real people in our community 🤝.

---

---

🗝️ Takeaways

• 🎭 Conservative media continues to weaponize border issues, using fear-based rhetoric about fentanyl and crime

• ⚖️ Legal system being portrayed as "weaponized" when used against conservative interests while celebrating Trump's legal attacks

• 🎓 Higher education under attack for promoting democratic participation among students

• 🗳️ Voter suppression narratives being normalized through unverified claims of ballot irregularities

• 💼 GOP operatives using immigration fear-mongering to drive 2024 voter turnout

---

⏬ Jump to the 🦉 Three Sonorans Commentary based on:

---

📻 What They Discussed

On an unseasonably hot Tuesday, October 22nd, 2024, "Winn Tucson" aired on 1030 The Voice, positioning itself as "a new voice and a different point of view" where "it's about issues, not politics."

Host Kathleen Winn welcomed three significant guests:

• Brandon Judd, a newly retired 25-year Border Patrol veteran and former National Border Patrol Council President, appearing as a surrogate for J.D. Vance;

• Dennis Wilenchik, a prominent Republican attorney who founded his firm in 1991 and

• State Representative Rachel Jones from LD-17.

🛂 Border Security and Immigration Rhetoric

The show opened with Brandon Judd, who framed his recent retirement from the Border Patrol as a transition into political advocacy. His discussion centered on criticizing the Biden administration's border policies, mainly targeting Vice President Kamala Harris's role. Judd claimed he "had the impossible task of trying to convince this administration to do what's right for the first three years."

Key points included:

• Criticism of Harris's border response

• Discussion of border wall effectiveness

• Claims about fentanyl trafficking

• Dismissal of Washington Post reporting on immigrant crime rates

• Arguments about policy versus infrastructure

Notable quote: "All of these different things, it all comes down to border security. Yet they constantly put their own power ahead of what's best for the American people."

⚖️ Legal Warfare in Arizona Politics

Dennis Wilenchik's segment focused on the Cochise County election case, particularly defending Tom Crosby while discussing Peggy Judd's plea deal. He characterized Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes's actions as politically motivated prosecution.

Key discussions included:

• Peggy Judd's plea to a Class III misdemeanor

• Tom Crosby's ongoing legal battle

• Claims of weaponization of the legal system

• Criticism of AG Mayes's narrow election victory margin

• Discussion of election certification processes

Notable quote: "The state came after her with all the might of the state... they're working with government money, our money."

🗳️ Campus Politics and Voter Controversy

The final segment with Rachel Jones raised two controversial voting issues:

1. An alleged case of a moved resident's ballot being voted

2. University of Arizona's Democratic voter outreach

The discussion particularly focused on a text message sent to U of A students promoting Democratic candidates and early voting opportunities on campus.

Key points:

• Claims about ballot handling irregularities

• Discussion of University political messaging

• Calls to "pull funds" from universities

• Concerns about student voter targeting

• Questions about the proper use of university resources

Notable quote from Jones: "If this came directly from U of A administration or anybody within that school, absolutely not. That is completely inappropriate."

---

🦉 Three Sonorans Commentary

As we approach the critical 2024 election, Southern Arizona's conservative media continues its assault on immigrant rights, voter access, and educational freedom. The October 22nd episode of Winn Tucson provides a disturbing window into how right-wing propaganda machinery operates in our borderlands.

🏜️ Weaponizing the Border Against Humanity

Brandon Judd, fresh from his Border Patrol retirement, continues the dehumanization of migrants through fear-mongering rhetoric. His claims about fentanyl and crime statistics deliberately ignore the humanitarian crisis created by militarized border policies.

When he states, "All of these different things, it all comes down to border security," he's really saying that human rights, asylum laws, and international obligations don't matter.

The show's persistent linking of immigration to crime and drugs represents a classic xenophobic narrative that ignores the real human cost of border militarization. Missing from this discussion are the deaths in the desert, the separated families, and the trauma inflicted on asylum seekers.

📚 Attack on Educational Freedom

The segment attacking the University of Arizona's voter outreach reveals the GOP's broader strategy of suppressing young and minority voters while crying "indoctrination."

Rachel Jones's call to "pull funds" from universities promoting democratic participation exposes the authoritarian impulse behind conservative "educational reform."

⚖️ Selective Justice

Perhaps most telling is Dennis Wilenchik's defense of election deniers while claiming the justice system is "weaponized" against conservatives. This double standard - celebrating Trump's legal attacks while crying foul when conservatives face accountability - exemplifies the right's increasing comfort with authoritarian governance.

The treatment of the Cochise County case demonstrates how conservative media frames accountability as persecution while normalizing actual attacks on democratic processes.

🗳️ The Real Voter Suppression

While the show spreads unverified claims about ballot irregularities, it ignores the real voter suppression happening in Arizona: attacks on student voting, restrictions on ballot access, and intimidation of minority voters.

💭 Final Thoughts

This episode of Winn Tucson exemplifies how conservative media weaponizes legitimate concerns about governance into tools for undermining democracy, suppressing votes, and demonizing immigrants.

As progressive voices in the borderlands, we must continue exposing these narratives while fighting for genuine solutions that center on human dignity, democratic participation, and social justice.

The road to 2024 runs through Arizona. Will we let fear-mongering and xenophobia determine our future, or will we stand for the inclusive, democratic values that truly make America great?

---

If you enjoyed this article, buy us a cup of coffee! We 🤎☕‼️

---

👯 People Mentioned

• POLITICAL FIGURES:

  • Donald Trump

    • Referenced as potential 2024 presidential candidate

    • Quote about him from Brandon Judd: "thank God for people like Trump who do that, notwithstanding that they indict him"

  • J.D. Vance

    • Current role unclear, but appearing as Trump surrogate

    • Described by Winn: "probably one of the best...Republicans and the Trump team are served well by him"

    • Noted for debate performance: "he didn't come in...He did not have Trump style"

  • Kamala Harris

    • Current Vice President

    • Criticized by Brandon Judd: "had almost four years to get this right...she's willing to secure the border. Just put me in the White House"

  • Ruben Gallego

    • Democrat mentioned in U of A voting controversy

    • Criticized for voting against HR2: "Ruben Gallegos balked at this bill"

  • Kari Lake

    • Running for U.S. Senate

    • Mentioned in context of legal battles

  • Tim Walz

    • Mentioned in context of debate with J.D. Vance

    • Quote about debate: "he absolutely destroyed Walton in that debate"

• LAW ENFORCEMENT/BORDER:

  • Brandon Judd

    • Retired Border Patrol Council President and 25-year veteran

    • Key quote: "We've been failed in so many different ways by this administration"

• LEGAL FIGURES:

  • Dennis Wilenchik

    • Republican attorney since 1991

    • Quote: "The state came after her with all the might of the state"

  • Kris Mayes

    • Arizona Attorney General

    • Criticized: "elected by 228 votes" and "weaponizing" legal system

  • Peggy Judd

    • Cochise County Supervisor who took plea deal

    • Described as someone who "rolled over" according to Wilenchik

  • Tom Crosby

    • Cochise County Supervisor fighting legal battle

    • Praised by Wilenchik: "thank God for people like Tom Crosby who stand up and fight"

• LOCAL POLITICS:

  • Kathleen Winn

    • Host of Winn Tucson

    • Quote about voting: "please use your vote as your voice"

  • Rachel Jones

    • State Representative for LD-17

    • Quote about universities: "they are indoctrinating children"

  • Juan Ciscomani

    • Mentioned by caller regarding endorsement

  • Corey McGarr

    • State Representative mentioned briefly

• MENTIONED WITHOUT CONTEXT:

  • Stephen Richard

  • Adrian Fontez

  • Katie Hobbs

  • Abe Hamidah

  • Charlie Kirk

  • Mike Pence

  • Barack Obama

  • Doug Ducey

---

🧐 Propaganda AI-nalysis

The October 22nd, 2024 episode of Winn Tucson demonstrates several classic propaganda techniques, wrapped in the format of a "different point of view" show that claims to be "about issues, not politics" - itself a form of propaganda through false neutrality.

🔍 Key Propaganda Strategies Employed

1. Fear Mongering

• Constant references to fentanyl deaths

• Repeated association of immigrants with crime

• Brandon Judd's quote linking immigration to "murdered United States citizens that have raped United States citizens"

• Creation of crisis narrative about border security

2. False Dichotomy

• Presenting only two options: complete border militarization or "open borders"

• Portraying universities as either "indoctrinating" or teaching

• Framing legal accountability as either "weaponization" or justice

3. Appeal to Authority

• Using Brandon Judd's Border Patrol credentials to legitimize anti-immigrant rhetoric

• Leveraging Dennis Wilenchik's legal background to criticize legitimate prosecutions

• Presenting Rachel Jones's legislative position as expertise on education

4. Othering

• Consistent use of "these people" when referring to immigrants

• Dehumanizing language about border crossers

• Creating in-group (conservatives) versus out-group (Democrats, immigrants, universities) dynamics

5. Victimhood Narratives

• Portraying conservatives as victims of "weaponized" justice system

• Framing border security advocates as victims of Democratic obstruction

• Presenting Republican politicians as victims of media bias

💭 Linguistic Manipulation

1. Loaded Language:

• "indoctrinating children" vs. teaching

• "weaponization" vs. legal accountability

• "open borders" vs. humanitarian immigration policy

2. Repetition of Key Phrases:

• "Border security"

• "What's right for the American people"

• "Weaponization"

🎭 Emotional Manipulation

1. Patriotic Appeals:

• Frequent references to "what's best for the American people"

• Appeals to national security

• Use of "our country" versus "these people"

2. Fear-Based Messaging:

• Focus on crime statistics

• Emphasis on fentanyl crisis

• Allegations of election fraud

📡 Target Audience Conditioning

The show conditions its audience to:

1. Distrust democratic institutions

2. Fear immigrant communities

3. Question higher education

4. Reject legitimate legal processes

5. Accept unverified claims about election integrity

🔄 Narrative Control

The show maintains narrative control through:

1. Selective guest booking

2. Limited perspective presentation

3. Unchallenged assertions

4. Echo chamber reinforcement

5. Emotional rather than factual appeals

🚩 Red Flags for Listeners

1. Lack of diverse viewpoints

2. Absence of factual challenge

3. Heavy reliance on emotional appeals

4. Oversimplification of complex issues

5. Consistent scapegoating

6. Unverified claims presented as facts

This analysis reveals a sophisticated propaganda operation designed to reinforce conservative narratives while appearing to be "about issues, not politics." The show's format and messaging strategy effectively create an echo chamber that amplifies right-wing talking points while inoculating listeners against alternative viewpoints.