🌵 Tucson's Future at Crossroads: Free Transit, Rising Taxes, and Snoop Dogg's Impact | 2025 Preview
Mayor Romero, Supervisor Grijalva emerge as potential frontrunners for Congressional seat
Based on the Wake Up Tucson show from 12/30/24 - 1/2/25 on KVOI-1030AM.
🙊 Notable quotes from the show
"Crime on the bus? That is ludicrous." - Mayor Regina Romero, defending fare-free transit program
"We're going to be at 9.2% (sales tax). There's only one community or a couple of communities higher than that. That's Mammoth and Superior and Florence." - Grant Kruger on Prop 414
"We need to keep Tucson economically competitive and stop trying to ring extra blood out of a rock in a community that's already impoverished." - Josh Jacobson on proposed tax increases
😽 Keepin’ It Simple Summary for Younger Readers
👧🏾✊🏾👦🏾
🌇 Tucson's leaders spent the last week of 2024 discussing big changes coming to our city. 🚍 Some want to keep free bus rides for everyone, while others think people should pay. 💰 They argued about 🏙️ new buildings, 🌳 parks, and 🏟️ sports venues being built, and whether they will help everyone or just some people. They also talked about raising the minimum wage 💵 (how much money workers get paid) and whether to add new taxes 🧾 to help pay for 🚓 police and 🚒 firefighters. The most interesting part was that 🎤 Snoop Dogg helped sponsor Tucson's football bowl game 🏈, which brought lots of visitors to town! 🎉
🗝️ Takeaways
🚌 The debate over free public transit reveals deeper class divisions in Tucson, with business leaders blaming it for crime while advocates see it as an essential service
🏘️ Housing affordability crisis continues as developers resist EV charging requirements while homelessness visibility increases
💵 Minimum wage increase to $15 in city limits, creating new economic pressures and jurisdictional differences
🏆 Arizona Bowl sponsorship by Snoop Dogg brings national attention but raises questions about community benefit
Wake Up Tucson's Year-End Review Reveals Deep Divides in Old Pueblo's Future
As we enter 2025, this week's Wake Up Tucson broadcasts offered a fascinating window into the ideological battles shaping our community's future.
With regular host Chris DeSimone absent, a rotating cast of guest hosts, including prominent business owners and local political figures, provided unusually candid discussions about Tucson's challenges and opportunities.
The Public Transit Debate: A Microcosm of Tucson's Class Struggle
The heated discussions around Tucson's fare-free bus system perfectly illustrate how class and privilege shape local policy debates.
When Mayor Regina Romero defended the program against critics who blamed it for crime, she highlighted a fundamental truth: public transportation is an essential service, not a luxury to be rationed based on ability to pay.
Yet business leaders like Grant Krueger and Josh Jacobson, speaking from positions of relative privilege, perpetuated harmful narratives about "crime buses" while ignoring how inaccessible transportation traps people in poverty.
Their focus on fare collection as a security measure betrays a deeper disconnect. They seem more concerned about the visibility of poverty than its causes.
Housing Crisis: The Elephant in Tucson's Living Room
The discussions around homelessness and housing revealed how deeply entrenched "tough love" narratives remain in local discourse, even as they've failed to address the root causes of housing insecurity. The hosts' dismissive reactions to encampments at "100 Acre Wood" and along the Santa Cruz River demonstrate a troubling tendency to view visible poverty as a nuisance rather than a policy failure.
While the Tucson Crime Free Coalition has made some progress on mental health response, their broader approach emphasizes enforcement over evidence-based solutions like Housing First.
Their focus on "cleaning up" visible signs of poverty while opposing policies that would make housing more affordable exposes the contradictions in their platform.
The debate over electric vehicle charging requirements in new apartment developments particularly highlighted how "business-friendly" politics often work against housing affordability. When developers use such requirements as an excuse not to build, they're really saying that their profit margins matter more than meeting community needs.
The real conversation we should have is about ensuring both sustainability and affordability—goals that shouldn't be treated as mutually exclusive.
Beyond Tax Politics: Funding Tucson's Future
The debate over Proposition 414 exposed deep contradictions in local fiscal politics. While concerns about regressive taxation in a high-poverty city are legitimate, the business community's reflexive opposition to new revenue ignores how chronic underinvestment created many of the problems they decry.
Josh Jacobson's criticism that the proposed tax lacks oversight has merit, but his solution - simply opposing all new revenue - offers no path to funding essential services.
Tucson's poverty rate isn't an accident—it's the predictable result of policies that consistently prioritize business interests over community needs.
Congressman Schweikert's call-in was particularly revealing.
His warnings about national debt ring hollow, given his support for tax policies that primarily benefit corporations and the wealthy. When he spoke of modernizing government, he focused entirely on cost-cutting, ignoring how decades of disinvestment have left critical services understaffed and underfunded.
The hosts' celebration of tax policy driving businesses to suburban jurisdictions perfectly illustrates the race-to-the-bottom mentality that keeps Arizona wages low and public services inadequate. Rather than competing to offer the lowest taxes, we should collaborate regionally to ensure sustainable funding for infrastructure and services that benefit everyone.
Immigration Rhetoric vs Reality: Unpacking Border Narratives
The hosts' discussion of border issues demonstrated how easily misinformation spreads, even among local opinion leaders.
Claims about "10 million" unauthorized entries not only misrepresent the data but feed into dehumanizing narratives that treat migration as an invasion rather than a complex humanitarian issue.
The complete absence of indigenous perspectives was particularly glaring. As the hosts casually discussed expanding development into traditionally native lands, they perpetuated centuries-old patterns of settler colonialism. The Tohono O'odham Nation's perspective on border militarization and its impact on their ancestral territories went unmentioned.
When discussing border communities like Bisbee, the focus remained firmly on law enforcement rather than the region's rich cultural heritage or the economic factors driving migration.
The human cost of militarized border policies—including deaths in the desert and family separations—was conspicuously absent from the conversation.
Development for Whom? Examining Tucson's Growth Politics
The discussions around economic development revealed persistent blind spots in how local leaders think about growth and prosperity. While developments like the Snoop Dogg-sponsored Arizona Bowl and Mosaic Quarter sports complex were celebrated, critical questions about who benefits went unasked.
The hosts' complaints about minimum wage increases were particularly telling. Grant Krueger and Josh Jacobson lamented rising labor costs while seemingly unconcerned about whether their workers can afford to live in the communities they serve.
Their focus on "wage compression" ignored how inflation and housing costs have eroded worker purchasing power.
Celebrating projects like St. Phillips Plaza highlighted how "revitalization" often means gentrification in practice. While such developments bring amenities, they also accelerate displacement and reinforce patterns of economic segregation.
The assumption that any development is good development ignores how past "urban renewal" projects have often destroyed historically marginalized communities.
The discussion of vacant storefronts becoming smoke shops revealed classist assumptions about what businesses "belong" in different neighborhoods. Rather than examining how economic inequality shapes retail patterns, the hosts defaulted to moralizing about certain types of commerce.
Beyond the Status Quo: Seeds of Progress
Despite the often regressive framing, some moments suggested the potential for more inclusive dialogue. While imperfect, the Tucson Crime Free Coalition's work on mental health response shows how focused advocacy can achieve progressive goals even in challenging political environments.
The hosts' genuine concern for Tucson's future, even if viewed through an overly business-centric lens, opens a dialogue about more inclusive solutions. While sometimes oversimplified, their critiques of bureaucratic inefficiency highlight real barriers to implementing progressive policies effectively.
The discussion of Congressman Raúl Grijalva's upcoming retirement and its implications for local politics suggested a growing recognition of how demographic changes reshape political possibilities.
While speculation about Mayor Romero's potential congressional candidacy focused on horse-race politics, it also highlighted the increasing political power of Tucson's Latino community.
Building the Tucson We Need
As we enter 2025, Tucson stands at a crossroads. Will we continue prioritizing business interests over human needs? Will we address root causes or simply manage symptoms? Will we build genuine equity or settle for surface-level changes?
The discussions on Wake Up Tucson this week didn't resolve these questions, but they highlighted the competing visions we must reconcile. Progressive solutions focused on human dignity need not conflict with economic vitality - in fact, investing in people and communities is essential for sustainable prosperity.
Several critical challenges demand immediate attention:
Housing Affordability: We need policies that create truly affordable housing while preventing displacement, not just incentives for luxury development.
Transit Equity: Making public transportation accessible and efficient benefits everyone, not just current riders. We must reject false narratives that stigmatize transit users.
Economic Justice: Living wages and worker protections are not only moral imperatives but essential for building stable communities and sustainable local economies.
Most importantly, we need to expand who has a voice in these conversations. The perspectives of transit riders, working families, indigenous communities, and others directly impacted by policy choices were largely missing from these discussions. Until that changes, we'll continue having incomplete conversations that generate heat but little light.
Our community's challenges are complex and will not be solved through simplistic ideological prescriptions from any side. However, by bringing more voices to the table and focusing on evidence-based solutions rather than predetermined conclusions, we can work toward the truly safe and vibrant city we all want to see.
The path forward requires honest dialogue about hard truths: that poverty isn't accidental but structural, that development without equity perpetuates inequality, and that true public safety comes from meeting community needs, not just increasing enforcement.
We can only build the just and prosperous Tucson our community deserves by confronting these realities.
☕ If you enjoyed this article, give us a tip! We 🤎☕‼️
