📱 SignalGate: Trump's Cabinet Failures Can't Be Blamed on DEI, But on His “DUI Hire” Pete Hegseth

Inside the messaging app blunder that uncovered incompetence at the top of the U.S. government.

Mar 27, 2025

😽 Keepin’ It Simple Summary for Younger Readers
👧🏾✊🏾👦🏾

Top government officials 🤵‍♂️ made a big mistake by talking about secret 🤫 military plans on an app called Signal 📱, where they accidentally invited a journalist 📰 who wasn't supposed to be there. This shows how some leaders didn't follow important security rules 🔒, which is a problem because it could make our country less safe 🛡️. Even though mistakes were made, they still didn't get into trouble 😕, which isn't fair compared to how strict they are with other people. ⚖️

🗝️ Takeaways

📡 Security Blunders: Top Trump officials used the Signal app to discuss classified military operations, accidentally adding a journalist to the chat.
🕵️‍♂️ Lack of Accountability: Officials like Tulsi Gabbard and John Ratcliffe were questioned in Senate hearings but dodged responsibility.
🚔 Questionable Leadership: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, labeled as a "DUI Hire," faces scrutiny over his role in the incident.
🤐 Hypocrisy Exposed: While imposing strict social media rules on migrants, officials themselves fail to maintain basic security protocols.
🔍 Irony Highlighted: SignalGate echoes back to past criticisms of Clinton's emails, revealing a similar pattern of irresponsibility.

Give a gift subscription

SignalGate: Trump's Cabinet Failures Can't Be Blamed on DEI, But Perhaps on His "DUI Hire" Pete Hegseth

Ay, qué vergüenza. Once again, the administration that promised they would run the government "like a business" is showing us exactly what kind of business they had in mind: one where security protocols are optional, accountability is non-existent, and the highest levels of leadership communicate about matters of war and peace with the same care you'd use to organize a weekend barbecue.

Welcome back to the Frontera Resistance, where we track the ongoing circus of the Trump administration from our vantage point on the borderlands. Today, we're diving into what's being called "SignalGate" – a scandal that perfectly encapsulates the dangerous incompetence of Trump's cabinet officials, particularly his Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, whom many are now referring to as Trump's "DUI Hire."

What Exactly Is SignalGate? A Primer for the Uninitiated

For those who haven't been following this unfolding disaster, here's what you need to know: Top Trump administration officials, including Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, were caught using the Signal messaging app – yes, the encrypted messaging app we all use to avoid government surveillance – to discuss classified military operations against Houthi rebels in Yemen.

As if that weren't bad enough, someone in the chat (reportedly National Security Advisor Mike Waltz) accidentally added Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, to this supposed top-secret conversation. Imagínate – the same people in charge of our national security can't even check who's in their group chat before discussing war plans.

This isn't just embarrassing – it's potentially criminal. These officials were allegedly sharing information about imminent military strikes on an unsecured platform, the kind of behavior that would land regular government employees in federal prison.

The Senate Hearing: Deflection, Denial, and Dishonesty

On Tuesday, March 25th, Gabbard and Ratcliffe appeared before the Senate Intelligence Committee for what should have been a routine hearing. Instead, they faced pointed questions about SignalGate from senators, including Mark Warner (D-VA) and Mark Kelly (D-AZ).

When asked if they were aware of Defense Department policies prohibiting discussion of sensitive information on unsecured devices, Ratcliffe admitted he "wasn't familiar" with such policies – a stunning admission from the Director of the CIA. Gabbard, for her part, repeatedly refused to confirm whether she was even part of the chat, stating she "didn't want to get into specifics."

Senator Warner, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, described the whole affair as "mind-boggling." In his words: "We've seen this administration expose CIA agents in the past. We've seen Elon Musk and the Doge boys almost disclose classified information on a daily basis, and this is a very disturbing pattern."

Pete Hegseth: The "DUI Hire" at the Center of the Storm

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, a Trump loyalist with a troubling history, is at the center of this debacle. Hegseth, who was arrested for DUI in 2020, exemplifies the Trump administration's hiring philosophy: loyalty over competence.

According to reports, Hegseth may have been responsible for sharing classified operational details in the Signal group. Senator Warner stated that if it comes out that "Hegseth put forward these kinds of plans in this non-secure way, "I think he should be fired. I think he'd quit."

Hegseth's role in this scandal raises serious questions about his judgment and fitness for office. The Secretary of Defense is responsible for the operational security of our military – if he can't follow basic protocols for discussing classified operations, how can he be trusted to lead the Pentagon?

The Trump Administration's Response: Nothing to See Here

True to form, the Trump administration's response to SignalGate has been a masterclass in deflection and denial. Trump himself dismissed concerns, telling reporters:

"Certainly we'll look at this, but the main thing was nothing happened. The attack was totally successful. It was, I guess, from what I understand, took place during and it wasn't classified information."

Claro que sí, señor presidente – nothing to worry about, except for the fact that your entire national security team was discussing military operations on an app that any teenager could download from the App Store.

Meanwhile, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz took the classic Trump approach of blaming the media. Appearing on Fox News, Waltz suggested that Goldberg's presence in the chat was somehow suspicious, saying: "I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but of all the people out there, somehow this guy who has lied about the president... and he's the one that somehow gets on somebody's contact and then gets sucked into the screen. Wow."

Qué conveniente, no? It couldn't possibly be that Waltz himself made a mistake – it must be a conspiracy against Trump.

The Hypocrisy: "Rules for Thee, Not for Me"

The hypocrisy of SignalGate becomes even more apparent when you consider the Trump administration's other actions. Just as this scandal was unfolding, the administration was:

Signing executive orders targeting virtually non-existent election fraud
Instructing the Department of Homeland Security to stop processing certain green card applications
Implementing new requirements for migrants to submit their social media handles as part of the vetting process
Proposing new rules requiring migrants to give their social media accounts to immigration authorities

Let that sink in. The same administration that can't keep classified information off Signal is demanding access to migrants' social media accounts. The same officials who can't follow basic security protocols are implementing "maximum vetting" for people seeking legal status in this country.

As we say in the borderlands: una regla para el indio, otra para el vaquero – one rule for the Native, another for the cowboy.

Why This Matters to All of Us

You might be wondering why you should care about yet another Trump administration scandal.

Here's why SignalGate matters:

National Security: The casual handling of classified information puts operations and lives at risk.
Accountability: When top officials face no consequences for behavior that would send others to prison, it erodes trust in our entire system.
Hypocrisy: The contrast between how the administration treats immigrants versus how its own officials behave reveals their true priorities.
Competence: These incidents expose the dangerous incompetence at the highest levels of our government.

For those of us in border communities, the stakes are even higher. We live with the daily consequences of this administration's policies – the increased surveillance, the militarization of our lands, the separation of families. When we see the same officials implementing these harsh policies, unable to follow basic security protocols themselves, it exposes the fundamental injustice of the system.

The Historical Pattern: From "But Her Emails" to SignalGate

The irony of SignalGate cannot be separated from the 2016 election, when Trump and his supporters relentlessly attacked Hillary Clinton over her email server. "Lock her up" became their rallying cry, with Trump claiming Clinton's handling of emails disqualified her from office.

Now, we have an administration sharing war plans on Signal, accidentally adding journalists to classified conversations, and insisting it's no big deal. As one national security expert noted, "If you are a 'but her emails' person, this is precisely the kind of thing that you find a bit ironic and sort of horrifying."

The contrast is striking:

What Can We Do About It?

In the face of such flagrant disregard for security protocols and rule of law, it's easy to feel powerless. But there are concrete actions we can take:

Contact your representatives: Demand congressional hearings and accountability for those involved in SignalGate.
Support independent journalism: Outlets like The Atlantic are essential for exposing these scandals.
Remember in November: Elections have consequences. When officials face no accountability from their own party, voters must hold them accountable.
Organize locally: Build community resilience and resistance networks in your own area.
Stay informed: Follow developments in this and other scandals, and share accurate information with your networks.

Finding Hope in the Struggle

Despite the constant barrage of scandals and setbacks, there are reasons for hope. The exposure of SignalGate shows that transparency is still possible, that there are still officials willing to speak truth to power, and journalists willing to report it.

In my community along the border, we've lived through colonization, militarization, and exploitation for generations. We know that resistance is not just about opposing what is wrong – it's about creating what is right. While the Trump administration flounders in its own incompetence, we continue building networks of mutual aid, practicing traditional knowledge, protecting sacred lands, and strengthening our communities.

La lucha sigue – the struggle continues. But so does our resilience, our creativity, and our commitment to justice. Each scandal like SignalGate peels back another layer of the emperor's new clothes, showing that those who claim to be our "betters" are often the least qualified to lead.

So I invite you to join us in this work – not just of resistance, but of creation. Together, we can build communities and systems that truly serve the people, that honor the land, and that operate with the transparency and accountability that democracy demands.

What do you think about SignalGate? Does it change your perspective on the Trump administration's competence? How do you see the connection between this scandal and the administration's immigration policies? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.