💧 Desert Death Machine vs. Human Dignity: Inside Pima County's Shocking Vote
How $30K to save lives became controversial while $550K corporate handout sailed through
😽 Keepin’ It Simple Summary for Younger Readers
👧🏾✊🏾👦🏾
The Pima County supervisors had a big meeting 💼 where they had to decide how to spend taxpayer money 💰. They almost gave $550,000 to a business group 💼 that only created 23 jobs 👷♂️, but some supervisors said that was unfair ❌ and forced them to wait and think 🤔 about it more.
Meanwhile, one supervisor voted against ❌ spending just $30,000 to put water 💧 in the desert 🌵 for people who might die from thirst while crossing the border 🏜️.
Two supervisors also created new rules 📜 to make sure businesses can't secretly harm the environment 🌍 and to force more honesty in government deals 🏛️. The community is organizing 👥 to make sure their voices are heard 🎤 at the next meeting.
🗝️ Takeaways
💀 Steve Christy cast the lone vote against funding life-saving water stations for migrants
💰 Chamber of Southern Arizona received 18x more funding than Humane Borders despite creating only 23 jobs
🌊 Progressive Supervisors Allen and Cano forced unprecedented environmental justice policies
🤐 New transparency requirements challenge corporate NDAs in economic development
🗳️ 2-2 tie vote on corporate welfare contract forces July 15th reconsideration
🏛️ Environmental Impact Review policy establishes precedent for community protection
🚨 Immigration enforcement testimony reveals communities under attack
✊ Community organizing pressure successfully delayed corporate contract approval
When Corporate Cash Trumps Human Lives: Pima County's July 1st Meeting Exposes the Machine
An Indigenous Chicano Analysis of Power, Profit, and the People's Resistance
The Pima County Board of Supervisors meeting on July 1, 2025, laid bare the grotesque reality of local governance under late-stage capitalism: while our gente literally die in the desert.
Corporate polluters poison our tierra sagrada, elected officials debate whether saving human lives is worth $30,000 while handing over $550,000 to business lobbyists without batting an eye.
Welcome to Amerika, where water for the dying is controversial but welfare for the wealthy is routine.
The Players in This Theater of Cruelty
Board Composition: A Study in Contrasts
Present at this moral reckoning were Chair Rex Scott (District 1), the affable face of corporate-friendly governance; Vice Chair Jennifer Allen (District 3), emerging as our unexpected champion for environmental justice; Steve Christy (District 4), participating remotely with his characteristic disdain for human suffering; and Andrés Cano (District 5), representing the communities most impacted by these decisions.
Notably absent was Supervisor Matt Heinz (District 2) - his absence during critical votes speaks volumes about privilege and priorities.
When the going gets tough, the privileged get going... away from accountability.
The Land Acknowledgment That Actually Meant Something
Alicia Vasquez, Co-Director of the Mexican American Heritage and History Museum, delivered what should have been a routine land acknowledgment but instead became a powerful indictment of environmental racism.
Her words honored "the tribal nations who have served as caretakers of this land from time immemorial" while simultaneously announcing her project documenting 40 years of TCE contamination on Tucson's predominantly Chicano Southside.
Vasquez's timing wasn't coincidental.
As she explained: "This year is the 40th anniversary of it becoming public knowledge that TCE was in fact contaminating the Tucson South side... we're calling this survival and resistance."
Survival and resistance - three words that encapsulate our entire lived experience under settler colonialism.
The Humanitarian Crisis: When $30,000 Becomes a Moral Test
Humane Borders: Saving Lives While Politicians Play Politics
The renewal of Humane Borders' $30,000 contract became the meeting's most revealing moral litmus test. For 25 years, this organization has placed water stations in the deadly Sonoran Desert, preventing countless deaths among migrants forced into dangerous crossing routes by militarized border policies.
Kirk Astroff, an 11-year volunteer with Humane Borders, delivered testimony that should haunt every supervisor's conscience:
"If you've looked at the Humane Borders death map on our website, you'd see that it includes over 4,300 people who have died out in the deserts west and south of Tucson."
He personalized the statistics with the story of José Reyes Mendoza, age 43, who "died within feet of the Manville Road two days before Christmas in 2022" from dehydration and exposure.
Astroff continued: "He died from dehydration and exposure. After traveling an untold number of miles on foot, passing the Border Patrol check station at milepost 26 in the Altar Valley, and making it almost all the way to the Silver Bell Mine. He still perished from lack of water."
Imagine dying of thirst within sight of salvation. That's the reality of our militarized border - a death machine disguised as security.
Religious Leaders Bring Moral Clarity
Reverend Jessica Braxton delivered prophetic truth to power, declaring: "Their blue water barrels are not political statements, they are compassionate ones that affirm the life inside of each living, breathing body on this earth."
She continued with devastating moral clarity: "This is not about encouraging border crossings, it's about preventing unnecessary death. This is about human dignity, this is about acknowledging the presence of God in all creation as water flows through everything."
Reverend Steve Keplinger provided crucial geopolitical context that explodes right-wing talking points about "choice" in migration.
He testified: "According to World Atlas, the 12 most dangerous cities in the world are all in Latin America... El Salvador, Guatemala, and Venezuela... have become one of the most dangerous places in the world for women."
When asked if people would attempt the crossing again despite near-death experiences, Keplinger responded: "Virtually all of them, even the ones who could not walk, tell me the same thing that they're going to do it again. Why? Well, I think we know why."
Because when your choice is death at home or possible death seeking safety, you choose hope.
Laurie Cantillo, Board Chair for Humane Borders, reminded supervisors that border militarization "is forcing them into even more remote and dangerous areas" while their water stations serve everyone: "Recently, one of our volunteers was approached by a Border Patrol agent asking him for water."
The Vote That Reveals Everything
When the vote came, the results exposed each supervisor's moral compass:
Final Result: 3-1 APPROVAL
Allen's response was particularly powerful: "The crisis that we have witnessed endured along the border since, you know, for for hundreds of years, but more recently since 1994, right, with the outset of Operation Gatekeeper strategies of deterrence and trying to make our border as difficult as possible for people to cross is a failed strategy."
Christy's lone dissent will be remembered. When historians write about this era's moral failures, his name will be there.
Corporate Welfare vs. Community Investment
The Chamber's $550,000 Hustle
The most contentious item involved renewing the Chamber of Southern Arizona's economic development contract—a half-million dollars in corporate welfare disguised as regional investment.
The contrast was staggering: $30,000 to save human lives required debate, but $550,000 for business lobbying was treated as inevitable.
Joe Snell, Chamber President, delivered standard corporate talking points about "200 companies brought into this market, 60,000 jobs created" over 20 years.
However, Supervisor Cano cut through the propaganda with devastating precision, highlighting that the Chamber created only 23 jobs in the first three quarters, despite receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds.
Fletcher McCusker, the Chamber's Treasurer, revealed the operation's true nature when discussing Non-Disclosure Agreements: "They've made it crystal clear to us that if our name gets out there, we're done... They want to be the first mover in this space."
Translation: We take your tax dollars to help corporations operate in secret while avoiding accountability to the communities that fund us.
Environmental Justice vs. Corporate Secrecy
Allen raised critical questions about conflicts between economic development and environmental protection, specifically citing the board's recent resolution protecting Ironwood National Monument from mining expansion.
McCusker's response revealed the Chamber's true priorities: "I can't imagine we would ever bring a mine to this board. However, Caterpillar is here... There's a lot of mining tech, however, that's interesting to us."
So we won't bring you a mine directly, but we'll bring you all the companies that make mining possible. How reassuring.
Allen's concerns about NDAs struck at the heart of democratic governance: "They can hinder me as a supervisor to be able to make good decisions that reflect the interests of my constituents, whom I'm sworn to represent."
The Crucial Vote Breakdown
Allen proposed a substitute motion reducing the Chamber contract to $300,000 and redirecting $250,000 to the county's own Economic Development Department, prioritizing public accountability over corporate welfare.
Result: 2-2 TIE - Item postponed to July 15th
A tie vote is actually a victory - it forces reconsideration and builds momentum for community organizing.
Progressive Policy Victories
Environmental Impact Reviews: A Game-Changer
Allen introduced groundbreaking legislation requiring environmental impact analyses for economic development projects.
This policy would mandate a comprehensive review of "immediate and cumulative impacts to the quality and quantity of all relevant water sources; energy demand and generation requirements; and the compatibility with Pima County Climate Action Plan."
Finally, someone is asking the obvious question: What does this actually cost our environment and our future?
NDA Reform: Demanding Transparency
The companion measure addresses Non-Disclosure Agreements in economic development, requiring policies that reflect "Pima County's commitment to government transparency and provide sufficient and timely information that enables sound policy-making decisions as well as robust public input."
Both measures passed 3-1 with Christy as the lone dissenter, establishing crucial precedents for community-centered governance.
Immigration Enforcement: Communities Under Attack
Christina Mock-Tarian, a public school teacher and fourth-generation U.S. citizen, delivered urgent testimony about ICE enforcement:
"We didn't like to see masked people with a lot, masked law enforcement with no ID, arresting people... The problem with having a secret police going and rounding people up is that there's no accountability."
Isabel Garcia, former Pima County Legal Defender with 22.5 years of experience, provided devastating historical context:
"We're living through a really historic moment... abductions. Imagine being abducted by a hooded man... Immigration laws have been based on the hatred of Mexicans."
Garcia's conclusion demands action:
"We are the number one economy and they'll tell you why... it's because of the undocumented labor force... Yes, I'm sorry. When we decided that we needed cheap labor and we lynched immigrants and we're not going back and you have to protect us."
The truth they don't want you to hear: Our economy depends on immigrant labor while we criminalize their existence.
What This Means for You
Every decision made in that room affects our daily lives. When supervisors approve corporate welfare over humanitarian aid, they're choosing the profit margins of wealthy developers over the survival of our most vulnerable community members. When they prioritize business secrecy over environmental protection, they're gambling with our children's future for short-term economic gains.
The water crisis isn't abstract - it's about whether your familia will have clean drinking water. The immigration enforcement isn't theoretical - it's about whether your neighbors feel safe calling 911. The environmental policies aren't academic - they're about whether our nietos (grandchildren) inherit a livable planet.
This is what it looks like when the machine tries to grind our communities into profit margins.
Building the Resistance
The July 15th meeting represents a crucial moment.
The Chamber contract returns for final consideration, and community pressure can tip the balance toward accountability. Progressive organizers must mobilize now to ensure that public dollars serve public good, not private profit.
Take Action:
Attend the July 15th Board meeting - your presence matters
Contact Allen and Cano - support progressive leadership
Pressure Scott and Christy - demand community accountability
Join local environmental justice organizations - build lasting power
Support immigrant rights groups - protect vulnerable communities
The movimiento (movement) continues because our survival depends on it. From the water stations saving lives in the desert to the environmental policies protecting our tierra, every victory builds toward the world our communities deserve.
Keep Fighting, Keep Hope
Sí se puede - yes we can, and yes we will. Support Three Sonorans Substack to keep this critical analysis and community organizing coming. Together, we're building the future where human dignity trumps corporate profit, where environmental justice guides economic development, and where our communities control their own destiny.
What Do You Think?
The struggle for environmental justice and immigrant rights continues in our communities every day. How can we better pressure elected officials to prioritize community needs over corporate interests? What specific actions will you take to support progressive policies in Pima County?
Leave your thoughts below - la lucha sigue (the struggle continues).
Have a scoop or a story you want us to follow up on? Send us a message!
