👑 CROWN Act Dethroned: Judge Upholds School's Hair Discrimination!
🏛️ Courting Controversy: CROWN Act Fails to Protect Black Student's Rights 🌊 Waves of Change Held Back: Federal Ruling Dams Progress on Hair Equality
😽 Keepin’ It Simple Summary for Younger Readers
👧🏾✊🏾👦🏾
👦🏾📚 In 2023, a boy named Darryl got in trouble at school for his hair. 📜 Texas made a new rule saying schools shouldn't do that. 📅 But in 2024, a judge said the school could still have its own hair rules. 😞 Darryl missed a lot of school because of this. 🌍 People around the world are talking about it. 💪 Many people are working to change things so all hairstyles are accepted at school. 🔜 The fight isn't over, and more changes might come in the future.
🎭 The CROWN Act: A Paper Tiger?
In a disheartening turn of events on August 7, 2024, a federal judge largely upheld a Texas high school's discriminatory hair policies despite the recent enactment of the CROWN Act.
This ruling in the case of Darryl George, a Black student who faced multiple suspensions for his natural locs since the summer of 2023, raises serious questions about the effectiveness of anti-discrimination legislation in combating systemic racism.
The CROWN Act, which stands for "Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair," was signed into law in Texas on May 23, 2023, and went into effect on September 1, 2023. It was designed to prohibit race-based hair discrimination.
However, the judge's decision to dismiss most of the claims in George's lawsuit suggests that the act may lack the teeth necessary to effect real change in educational institutions.
Timeline of Key Events:
May 23, 2023: Texas CROWN Act signed into law
Summer 2023: Darryl George faces initial suspensions for his dreadlocks
August 31, 2023: George was suspended one day before the CROWN Act took effect
September 1, 2023: CROWN Act goes into effect in Texas
2023-2024 School Year: George spends most of his junior year in in-school suspension
August 7, 2024: Federal judge rules on George's lawsuit
🧑⚖️ Unpacking the Judge's Ruling
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown's August 7, 2024 ruling is a mixed bag of disappointment and a glimmer of hope. While he dismissed claims against state officials and school employees, as well as allegations of racially disparate enforcement and First Amendment violations, he allowed the claim of sex discrimination to proceed.
The judge's reasoning that the school district failed to provide a rationale for sex-based distinctions in its dress code opens a narrow path for challenging these discriminatory policies.
However, the dismissal of other claims, particularly those related to racial discrimination, is a stark reminder of the uphill battle faced by students of color in asserting their rights to cultural expression.
Key Aspects of the Ruling:
Dismissed claims against Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton
Rejected allegations of race-based enforcement of the dress code
Dismissed First Amendment claims related to hair length
Allowed sex discrimination claim to proceed
🏫 School Policies vs. Cultural Identity
The case of Darryl George sharply highlights the conflict between rigid school policies and the right to cultural identity.
Barbers Hill High School's insistence that male students' hair not fall below eyebrows, ear lobes, or shirt collars is a thinly veiled attempt to enforce Eurocentric beauty standards.
This policy not only disregards the cultural significance of natural hairstyles for Black students but also imposes undue hardship on them. George's experience of spending most of his junior year (2023-2024) in in-school suspension, sitting uncomfortably on a stool for eight hours a day, is a testament to the severe consequences of such discriminatory policies.
Timeline of George's School Experience:
Summer 2023: Initial conflict with the school over hair policy
August 31, 2023: First suspension
September 2023 - June 2024: Repeated in-school suspensions
August 2024: Legal battle reaches federal court
🔍 The Broader Implications
This ruling has implications that extend far beyond the walls of Barbers Hill High School. It underscores the persistent challenge of translating legislative progress into tangible change on the ground.
The CROWN Act, while a step in the right direction, clearly requires stronger enforcement mechanisms and a more comprehensive approach to dismantling systemic racism in educational settings.
Moreover, the case highlights the intersectionality of discrimination, with the sex-based aspect of the dress code emerging as a potential avenue for legal challenge. This serves as a reminder that the fight against discrimination must simultaneously address multiple overlapping forms of oppression.
Timeline of CROWN Act Implementation:
July 3, 2019: California becomes the first state to pass the CROWN Act
September 21, 2020: U.S. House of Representatives passes federal CROWN Act
May 23, 2023: Texas signs CROWN Act into law
September 1, 2023: Texas CROWN Act takes effect
August 7, 2024: Federal judge's ruling challenges CROWN Act's effectiveness
📚 Historical Context of Hair Discrimination
To fully understand the significance of this case, it's crucial to examine the historical context of hair discrimination in the United States. The policing of Black hair has deep roots in the country's history of racism and oppression.
Historical Timeline:
1700s-1800s: Enslaved people's hair often shaved or covered
Late 1800s-Early 1900s: Rise of hair straightening products and techniques
1960s-1970s: The Civil Rights movement sees a resurgence of natural hairstyles
1980s-1990s: Continued discrimination in professional and educational settings
2000s-2010s: Natural hair movement gains momentum
2019: The first CROWN Act passed in California
2023-2024: Darryl George case highlights ongoing struggles
🌍 Global Perspectives on Natural Hair
While this case focuses on the United States, it's important to recognize that hair discrimination is a global issue. Many countries have grappled with similar challenges, and some have taken steps to address them.
Global Timeline:
2016: Protests in South Africa over school hair policies
2017: U.S. Army revises regulations to allow more natural hairstyles
2020: UK Equality and Human Rights Commission issues guidance on hair discrimination
2021: New Zealand parliament member ejected for refusing to wear a tie, sparking cultural dress debate
2023: Texas passes CROWN Act
2024: Darryl George case gains international attention
💼 Impact on Future Employment and Opportunities
The implications of hair discrimination extend beyond the educational sphere and into the professional world.
Students who face discrimination in schools may internalize negative messages about their appearance, potentially affecting their self-esteem and career aspirations.
Timeline of Workplace Hair Discrimination Cases:
2010: Chastity Jones denied job over dreadlocks, leads to 2016 court case
2018: UPS changes policy to allow natural hairstyles and facial hair
2019: New York City bans hair discrimination
2021: U.S. Army updates grooming standards to be more inclusive
2023-2024: Darryl George case highlights potential long-term impacts of school discrimination
🔮 The Future of Hair Discrimination Legislation
The limitations exposed by the George case raise questions about the future of anti-discrimination legislation.
While the CROWN Act represents significant progress, this ruling demonstrates the need for more robust and comprehensive laws.
Looking Forward:
2024-2025: Potential appeals and further legal challenges
2025: Possible amendments to strengthen the CROWN Act
2026 and beyond: Continued advocacy for comprehensive anti-discrimination measures
If you enjoyed this article, buy us a cup of coffee!
🗝️ Takeaways
📜 2023 CROWN Act proves insufficient in 2024 court case
⚖️ Judge's 2024 ruling allows most school hair policies to stand
🎒 Black student's education disrupted throughout 2023-2024 school year
🌐 Case highlights global struggle against hair discrimination
🔄 Intersectionality of race and gender discrimination exposed in 2024 verdict
🚧 2024 ruling reveals need for stronger anti-discrimination laws
🗣️ Community activism intensifies from 2023 to 2024 and beyond